Re: [web-annotation] Updating vocabulary

@stain @azaroth42 @paolociccarese @BigBlueHat : I do not think I am in
 position of accepting this pull request myself. The PR modifies the 
Makefile for the generation of all the files, including the files Rob,
 Paolo, and Benjamin are editors of, and I cannot judge whether 
everything is fine or not. It may be all right, but this is not my 

Looking at the changes, I have also two comments/questions:

- I may be a github issue, but the PR lists a large number of changes 
which include some changes that have been done elsewhere already on 
the core specification files (eg, my re-write of the status section 
comment on document splitting). It is *probably* all right and it is 
just somehow incorporating earlier changes, but it looks strange to be
 listed there. Should we simply trust github?
- It seems that the right expression have been added to examples in 
the vocab document (or did I misread the diff file?).  But is it only 
done on some selected places? It is not clear to me. I think we should
 avoid not adding too complex things to examples overall.
- Does the pull request include adding binary/java files to the repo? 
The makefile seems to make use of specific java programs. Are we 
allowed to make such copies and put them to a repo without any further

I am o.k. with the other changes overall but, again, I do not think it
 is my role to accept (or not) this PR.

GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 31 March 2016 06:38:37 UTC