- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> On 30 Mar 2016, at 10:36, Stian Soiland-Reyes <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > OK, I think I agree with @iherman <https://github.com/iherman> that due to the licensing differences we should no do a redirect straight to the spec. > > However do I understand you right @iherman <https://github.com/iherman> that you don't want a a full listing as with LODE <http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/owlapi/https://rawgit.com/stain/web-annotation/updating/vocab/wd/oa.ttl> or Widoco <https://cdn.rawgit.com/stain/web-annotation/cb67ce387c031f02afe44ecdfbbfc7670d534afe/vocabulary/wd/oa.html> ? > > For the current https://www.w3.org/ns/oa.html <https://www.w3.org/ns/oa.html> we used LODE and hand-edited the top. > > > As far as I can see, the information in oa.html (ie, the RDF that I can extract) is identical to the turtle content, right? I think that is fine. (Minor issue: I do not know the details of the tool, but it would be good if it did not generate @xmlns:XXX for the prefixes but used @prefix instead. the usage @xmlns:XXX is deprecated in RDFa 1.1…) -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/199#issuecomment-203339079 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:15:48 UTC