Re: [web-annotation] Can I refine a state via a selector?

That we are discussing here whether the `refinedBy` property shared by
 `State` and `Selector` allows the nesting of one in the other only 
furthers my belief, which I've stated elsewhere, that `State` and 
`Selector` are not disjoint classes. Whether by time, space, or 
representation, there is a goal to refine a target. Whether certain 
refinements are nonsensical, ambiguous, or otherwise pose difficulties
 is not that concerning to me, provided there are common constructions
 that unambiguously handle common use cases.

I'm sorry to do this again because it seems to cause some stress, but 
I wish to ask once more: why are `hasState` and `hasSelector` 

GitHub Notification of comment by tilgovi
Please view or discuss this issue at
 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 23:13:19 UTC