- From: Randall Leeds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:13:17 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
That we are discussing here whether the `refinedBy` property shared by `State` and `Selector` allows the nesting of one in the other only furthers my belief, which I've stated elsewhere, that `State` and `Selector` are not disjoint classes. Whether by time, space, or representation, there is a goal to refine a target. Whether certain refinements are nonsensical, ambiguous, or otherwise pose difficulties is not that concerning to me, provided there are common constructions that unambiguously handle common use cases. I'm sorry to do this again because it seems to cause some stress, but I wish to ask once more: why are `hasState` and `hasSelector` different? -- GitHub Notification of comment by tilgovi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/195#issuecomment-203152677 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 23:13:19 UTC