- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 05:56:59 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> On 8 Mar 2016, at 23:31, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > Should the examples in the specs use resolvable URIs, that then resolve to the actual examples? > +1 > > And if so, how would we refer to the incorrect examples, which presumably would not be in the specifications? > I saw you have a subdirectory 'correct', we may have one for 'incorrect' :-) > Further, would an AnnotationCollection of the examples be valuable? (I think yes, being itself an example of a feature we define) > It may be valuable for testing/debugging. I presume you have some automatic means to produce that one, ie, it is easy to produce. So +1 from me. -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/55#issuecomment-194126591 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:57:02 UTC