- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 15:46:16 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
azaroth42 has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation: == Protocol examples should use comma separated headers in examples == Given that many implementations use a dictionary approach to sending and receiving headers, having multiple headers with the same name will result in data loss, compared to using comma separated values in a single header. For example the link headers: https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-protocol/#responses-without-annotations Consider adding a note explaining the rationale. http://www.w3.org/2016/07/29-annotation-irc#T15-45-55 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/333 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 29 July 2016 15:46:26 UTC