- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:12:01 -0700
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
- Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Message-ID: <CABevsUESSsPzwpE=NRPyeG+8Bo-fybRmdPX=snJfejosoVh=UA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Shane, Gregg! All of the examples in the specs are separately available via github pages, but not obviously in the main W3C site. A collection of the examples: http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd2/examples/correct/collection1.json Rob On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote: > We have had a lot of discussion in the past couple of weeks about how to > do testing. I feel that we have a clear path forward that will permit > exercising the data model and the protocol. There are a lot of open > questions, but we are making progress. > > Specifically, I have established a "Project" within Spec-Ops around test > development, and made Web Annotation a task of that Project. This is > mostly internal nonsense, and you all don't really care. > > I set up a discussion list within Spec-Ops for the Project that anyone can > join [1]. There is also a wiki [2] where we will be assembling concepts > as they develop. I am doing this in Spec-Ops space just because it is > expedient and because this work applies across several projects that we are > or plan to be working on in the next couple of months. > > Spec-Ops has also forked the Web Platform Tests (WPT) GitHub repo [3] so > that there is a place for us to put the tests and associated tools. The > concept here is that there is a familiar environment in which to develop > the tests and tools, and of course to run the tests and capture results. > > In a nutshell, we are looking at writing tests using a declarative grammar > that will be familiar to most of you since it looks just like the JSON you > have been writing in your spec. A tool on the test server will parse the > test files and present information about the tests through the WPT > interface. Test data will be analyzed (in the user agent or on the server) > and a result recorded. > > This general model can be used not just for Web Annotation, but also for > other specifications that rely only JSON message passing (there are lots of > these). But rest assured, we are not going sit around trying to craft the > perfect general case solution. That's not how I like to operate. Gregg > Kellogg (cc'd on this) has a lot of experience with this sort of testing, > and I am confident that we can leverage his knowledge to get something in > place quickly. > > More on the call tomorrow. > > [1] http://lists.spec-ops.io/listinfo.cgi/testdev-spec-ops.io > [2] https://wiki.spec-ops.io/wiki/AnnotationTesting > [3] https://github.com/Spec-Ops/web-platform-tests > > P.S. It is very hard to write tests without implementations to test > against. We can (and will) mock up some golden data to test the > infrastructure... but it would be great to have access to implementations > sooner than later. Even buggy ones! > > -- > Shane McCarron > Projects Manager, Spec-Ops > -- Rob Sanderson Information Standards Advocate Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 20:12:29 UTC