- From: tbdinesh via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:51:24 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
A bit more. "The issue of harassment" is about (harassing) publication about someone anywhere and not just on "their page". On another note, its about finding these publications. Imagine the annotations on a page are also indexed by search engines. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:28 PM, BigBlueHat <notifications@github.com> wrote: > "The issue of harassment" is about publication, not annotation. > > Annotation is initially a singular, personal action (it may stay in your > browser, or in that book you bought last year). Until you publish it, your > evil side notes don't effect anyone and can't therefore be consider > "harassment." Once published, however, the story changes. > > Publication spaces (i.e. annotation social networks such as Genius and > Hypothes.is) come with (necessary) community guidelines. One of those could > (and usually do) include "un-publishing" and/or moderating annotations that > run afoul of those guidelines. The user's right to *annotate* however > should not be prohibited, though their ability to *publish* may be > curtailed based on the guidelines set by the specific publisher. > > At the very least, we need to keep the act of "annotating" separate from > the act of "publishing." > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/204#issuecomment-210493638> > -- GitHub Notification of comment by tbdinesh Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/204#issuecomment-210563681 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 15 April 2016 17:51:26 UTC