W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > April 2016

Re: I18N review request: Web Annotation model and protocol

From: <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 16:38:32 +0100
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <56FE95F8.1010707@w3.org>
hi Ivan,

i thought i'd mention that we are creating a document that will 
hopefully help working groups do self-review or at least think about 
i18n issues as they develop the spec.  It's not to replace the i18n 
review, but may lead to various items being identified and fixed long 
before the review (as well as general education for the WG).

It occurs to me that it may be useful for you chaps to review the 
checklist even while we are doing the review, since you may spot things 
that we don't.  Would you like to give it a try?

The checklist is here:

As i mentioned, it is still in development. Mostly that means that there 
are other things to consider that aren't in the list, but it may also 
mean that we need to discuss certain guidelines.  Given its status, it 
may help us as well as helping you if you were to run through it.

What do you think?


On 31/03/2016 13:11, Ivan Herman wrote:
> Dear Addison, Richard,
> the Web Annotation WG has just published three working drafts:
> Web Annotation Data Model
> URI:http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-annotation-model-20160331/
> Web Annotation Vocabulary
> URI:http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-annotation-vocab-20160331/
> Web Annotation Protocol
> URI:http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-annotation-protocol-20160331/
> these documents are in what I would call "pseudo/virtual Last Call".
> Virtual, because, per process, there is no such thing asa Last Call WD
> any more; and pseudo, because there may be some minor technical changes
> still, but nothing fundamental.
> These are the three documents that the WG intends to publish as a
> Recommendation. The WG will have a face-to-face midMay (17-18, to be
> precise), and the plan is to go to CR right after that. It would be
> great if we received your comments bythen, so that we could incorporate
> the changes, if any, into the CR publications.
> The WG works mostly on Github, processing github issues. Our Issues' are at:
> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues
> I have set up the labels that we would like to use for the review,
> namely i18n-review.
> Alternatively, if you prefer to use the groups mailing list, it is at:
> public-annotation@w3.org <mailto:public-annotation@w3.org>
> the group is open for mails coming from outside the Working Group.
> Thanks in advance for your reviews
> Ivan
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Friday, 1 April 2016 15:38:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:45 UTC