Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional?

> On 10 Sep 2015, at 17:17 , Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> 
wrote:
> 
> @iherman <https://github.com/iherman>: It's not a complete 
implementation, as I got stuck implementing paging (and hence the 
issues yesterday), but https://github.com/azaroth42/mangoserver 
<https://github.com/azaroth42/mangoserver> is getting there as a 
from-scratch implementation. I'm not sure that installing two packages
 and then three lines of code to use them is a big deal.
> 
> Overall, I'm concerned about the tendency to favor "I don't think 
people would do that" over actual implementation, usage and existing 
standards. If a demonstration that a debated feature is easy to 
support is insufficient, I fail to see how we can make quantitative 
decisions. "Code Talks", as they say.
> 
> That said, I can live with MUST for application/ld+json (default) 
and application/json, SHOULD for Turtle and MAY for other RDF formats.
> 
So can I


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704






-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by iherman
See 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/34#issuecomment-139284022

Received on Thursday, 10 September 2015 15:37:13 UTC