- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:19:32 -0700
- To: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
- Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABevsUEhbcO_M==Ah1A6SpVYiYvWV_7reevq1McRMWGZp4Dw8w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote: > 3 Cross-Context JSON-LD Integration, @id and @type > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Sep/0061.html > (Rob) > see > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Sep/0074.html > (Gregg) > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Sep/0062.html > (James) among others > Proposal: ## Compartmentalized Contexts * Have a base context that defines the JSON-LD keys the WG would like everyone to use for *our* predicates/classes * Have an additional context for non OA predicates and classes that we recommend * Revert the @id and @type change, or at most have it in a third, optional context In this way we can be the authority for our definitions, and we let others be the authority for theirs. However the second context would let developers who don't care about the bigger picture to focus on just a pure JSON serialization with known keys for everything. 4 Data Model issues > Issue review and plans for publication > I started writing out the 3.1 with the choice between Compact and Consistent, and passed it over to Tim. If it's ready, it would be good to review on the call. Thanks Frederick, all. Rob -- Rob Sanderson Information Standards Advocate Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 16:20:00 UTC