- From: Randall Leeds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 22:36:05 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
If the annotation specifies its own ID in the form a URI all of this is solved. Using JSON-LD as an example, you could dereference http://example.com/anno.json and see `"@id": "http://canonical.example.com/p/foobar123.json"` and that's totally okay. If the annotation is being re-published because some system wants to add information to it, then it's maybe not `owl:sameAs` anymore. It's a different resource, with possibly new content, `prov:derivedFrom` makes sense. But so does rel=canonical. Anyway, is this a data model issue or a protocol issue? It's tagged as "model" here, but I'm not sure it really is an issue with the model. -- GitHub Notif of comment by tilgovi See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/21#issuecomment-151665250
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 22:36:07 UTC