- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:56:29 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
I'm not /against/ adding it, by the way, I just want to make sure that there isn't already an existing mechanism that serves the same purpose. I mean role. I mean intent :wink: If there was an additional requirement that the URI of a user be kept intact, would that fulfill the use case? It seems like something that could be mandated to at least be owl:sameAs a new URI associated with the user, and any sort of credit or attribution should be against a URI not hopefully unique string. Then http://example.com/users/(sha-1-of-email) would need to be maintained by conforming systems, and we wouldn't need a new property. -- GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/115#issuecomment-159670934 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2015 16:56:38 UTC