- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:56:47 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> On 25 Nov 2015, at 06:45, Randall Leeds <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > Can you explain your claim that it is "not trivial amount of work to have Selectors go through the process separately from the rest of the model", Rob? > > Is there significant per-document overhead for publishing? Could that be mitigated through delegation or otherwise distributing the workload among more participants? > The only extra step is that we have do define a separate short name and, for the FPWD, we have to get the formal approval from the domain lead (ie, Ralph). This isn't a big deal. Editorially: there is a little bit of overhead in pushing the current 4.2 into a separate respec document, but that is minimal. The core text that the editors are working on right now remains, essentially, unchanged; even the examples may remain unchanged, by adding a note in the document that all examples are in the annotation domain, but there is no formal restriction to do so. Actually, your example could be reused (in a simplified form), too. If needed, I can also take the load of pushing this through, once the current text (with all the extras around selectors that you guys are working on) are done. > > I agree that selectors aren't useful without a resource to select from, but the class of that resource is not necessarily our SpecificResource. For instance, it may be applicable to a domain where state is made superfluous by content-addressing. > Agreed. But this is not something we have to specify. -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/110#issuecomment-159571321 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2015 10:56:57 UTC