- From: BigBlueHat via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:54:58 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Agree with @tilgovi. :+1: on :one: and :two:, but **not** on :three: I believe for :three: we should move discussion into a wider, email-based "is this our job right now" discussion around Fragment Identifiers--as FindText *could* benefit from one...but that's also not necessary for it's value and would likely only trip it up. I had earlier proposed extracting `SpecificResource`, but that was probably to large a piece to extract. Doing *only* selectors seems to give these bits the widest possible, while not introducing a new "wrapping" class for things that want to use them. So...again :+1: to :one: and :two:. -- GitHub Notification of comment by BigBlueHat Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/110#issuecomment-158440133 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 20 November 2015 15:55:00 UTC