Re: Improve GitHub labelling? (was: Re: [web-annotation] Associate license with content)

Add both:
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/labels

Going to tag a few things with them next.

Cheers!
Benjamin

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Yep, having labels for the workflow is very useful.
>
> In another WG we used the 'needs telco discussion' and 'editor's action'
> labels. Using our example, we would have removed the 'need telco
> discussion' and added the 'editors action' labels on this issue, and it is
> up to the editor to close the issue when his/her job is done.
>
> Just an idea
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
> On 19 Nov 2015, at 20:06, Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is> wrote:
>
> Sounds good. :) And an orange "needs discussion" label?
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> An "accepted" green light label?
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Good point in this issue below. I wonder if we need to have two separate
>>> issues or issue types? or at least use labels to tell "needs discussion"
>>> apart from "accepted" + "needs implementation."
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Rob Sanderson via GitHub <
>>> sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Re-opening for tracking purposes. Telco /accepted/ the proposal, but
>>>> it has yet to be implemented in the spec. Should keep open until that
>>>> time.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
>>>> Please view or discuss this issue at
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/100#issuecomment-158155548
>>>>  using your GitHub account
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rob Sanderson
>> Information Standards Advocate
>> Digital Library Systems and Services
>> Stanford, CA 94305
>>
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>