W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > February 2015

Re: Old spec easier to find...

From: Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:06:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CAE3H5FK_gLzyvL2EQdsHioPT6WYWobhSNA7CZ4FxNs708VgBzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Cc: "Denenberg, Ray" <rden@loc.gov>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Cute. ;)

s/{search}/{replace} really needs it's own RFC, Media Type, etc.

Could be useful with PATCH. ^_^

Thanks Rob (and/or Doug)!

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> {
>   "@type": "oa:Annotation",
>   "motivation": "oa:editing",
>   "body": {"value": "s/Rob/Doug/"},
>   "target": "
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Feb/0029.html"
> }
>
> ;)
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
> wrote:
>
>> Anyone want to write that change request up in Open Annotation Data Model
>> and send it to Rob? ;)
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> What I would suggest is to move this sentence up:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> “This group works in public, with details in the WG's* Work Mode*
>>> document <https://www.w3.org/annotation/wiki/Work_Mode> and the WG's
>>> Wiki <https://www.w3.org/annotation/wiki/>.”
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Move it up so it immediately follows the enumerated list (“The chartered
>>> specs consist of:”)   and is addition provide links as well to the most
>>> relevant current documents, which right now I suppose are the model and
>>> protocol.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ray
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Benjamin Young [mailto:bigbluehat@hypothes.is]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 02, 2015 3:37 PM
>>> *To:* W3C Public Annotation List
>>> *Subject:* Old spec easier to find...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Of someone visits
>>> http://www.w3.org/annotation/
>>>
>>> They'll be quickly lead to
>>> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
>>>
>>> And find it *much* harder to find the FPWD.
>>>
>>> Can this be fixed? Our is it intentional?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Benjamin
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rob Sanderson
> Information Standards Advocate
> Digital Library Systems and Services
> Stanford, CA 94305
>
Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 22:07:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:32 UTC