- From: Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:47:38 -0500
- To: "'James M Snell'" <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: "'Web Annotation'" <public-annotation@w3.org>
Yes I nearly suggested the infinitive form instead, but didn't know what to do with the "to" part. I.e. the infinitive form of "bookmarking" is "to bookmark". I suppose you just drop the "to"? Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: James M Snell [mailto:jasnell@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 10:41 AM > To: Denenberg, Ray > Cc: Web Annotation > Subject: Re: Motivations > > Speaking from the sidelines... I would strongly support this. With Activity > Streams, it was decided very early on that it would be better to use the > infinitive form of activity verbs in nearly all cases. I would take this one step > further and suggest "classify" to "classification"; "describe" for "description"; > "identify" for "identifier"; and "moderate" for "moderation". > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov> wrote: > > > > > > The motivations listed in 3.4 of the model, “bookmarking”, > > “classifying”, and so on … > > > > > > > > This is a cosmetic suggestion: I find these gerund construction a bit > > awkward, and would prefer “straight” nouns, as in the following table. > > > > > > > > > > > > Current Motivation > > > > Would Become: > > > > bookmarking > > > > bookmark > > > > classifying > > > > classification > > > > commenting > > > > comment > > > > describing > > > > description > > > > editing > > > > edit > > > > highlighting > > > > highlight > > > > identifying > > > > identifier > > > > moderating > > > > moderation > > > > questioning > > > > question > > > > replying > > > > reply > > > > tagging > > > > tag > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there support for this change? > > > > > > > > Ray
Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 15:48:12 UTC