W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Justify each Motivation with a behavior

From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:18:30 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-165427056-1450351109-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
well .. I would expect to have a controlled vocabulary for Motivation 
that can be accessed in a machine readable format (skos.xml is one 
possible, or the preffered option).

Yes .. I saw the mechanism for extending Motivations, which indeeed 
recommends to create norrower terms and I appreciate that. 

Still the question about the current list remains. Are these disjoint 
For example: commenting, editing, describing, questioning, reviewing 
If they are not disjoint, and there is a relathipnship between them, 
why is this not represented in the model? 


GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu
Please view or discuss this issue at 
 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2015 11:18:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:43 UTC