W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Support for Notification

From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:06:07 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-165378834-1450339566-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> On 16 Dec 2015, at 23:07, Sarven Capadisli 
<notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> @azaroth42 <https://github.com/azaroth42> I agree that notifications
 are in scope (not to mention that, we can already purpose LDP exactly
 for this). Solid extends LDP where applicable. I propose 
Solid/Ripples as a possibility, but like I said, it needs to iron out 
some stuff e.g., vocabulary. If the Web Annotation WG wants to 
investigate further, that'd be great.
> 
> I also agree with @iherman <https://github.com/iherman> that if this
 is at all stretching a bit far (given the state of things), it is 
better to leave out notifications for now.
> 
> 

Thank you. I believe that *at this moment* this is the only reasonable
 choice for this Working Group. We have other, more 
annotation-specific fishes to fry.

Formally, I would propose to leave this issue open but resolution 
should be postponed to (late) Spring 2016. If, by then, the Social Web
 WG gets significantly further, we can see whether a reference to 
their work is doable. If not, we should close the issue then without 
further actions.

(In particular, I do not believe we should use telco time on this 
issue in the coming months.)
> My preference is to pursue this further b/c I see where LDP/Web 
Annotation/Ripples fit together. cc @BigBlueHat 
<https://github.com/BigBlueHat>
> 
> 




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/49#issuecomment-165378834
 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2015 08:06:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:43 UTC