- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:06:07 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 23:07, Sarven Capadisli <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > @azaroth42 <https://github.com/azaroth42> I agree that notifications are in scope (not to mention that, we can already purpose LDP exactly for this). Solid extends LDP where applicable. I propose Solid/Ripples as a possibility, but like I said, it needs to iron out some stuff e.g., vocabulary. If the Web Annotation WG wants to investigate further, that'd be great. > > I also agree with @iherman <https://github.com/iherman> that if this is at all stretching a bit far (given the state of things), it is better to leave out notifications for now. > > Thank you. I believe that *at this moment* this is the only reasonable choice for this Working Group. We have other, more annotation-specific fishes to fry. Formally, I would propose to leave this issue open but resolution should be postponed to (late) Spring 2016. If, by then, the Social Web WG gets significantly further, we can see whether a reference to their work is doable. If not, we should close the issue then without further actions. (In particular, I do not believe we should use telco time on this issue in the coming months.) > My preference is to pursue this further b/c I see where LDP/Web Annotation/Ripples fit together. cc @BigBlueHat <https://github.com/BigBlueHat> > > -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/49#issuecomment-165378834 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2015 08:06:09 UTC