Re: [general] Topic Interest Poll

IRC Nick: scharf
Abstract Model: 0
Vocabulary: 0
Serialization: +1
HTTP API: +1
Client API: +1
Robust Anchoring: +1

On 2014-09-24 23:22, Robert Sanderson wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> As part of the WG call today we had a quick straw poll of who was interested in which topics that are part of our chartered work.  The results were very interesting, but of course only reflect those people who were on the call.
>
> Please if you could reply to this message with the following template filled out, I'll collect additional interest and then circulate the results.  This will help us with several aspects of managing the work, including prioritization of the
> topics, the possibility of having separate calls on separate topics, which areas we need to solicit additional participation for, and so forth.
>
> In the template, give a +1 for a deliverable if you are interested in actively engaging and discussing that topic; a +0 if you would pay attention to the topic if it was being discussed but it's less important; and a -1 if the topic is of
> no interest to you at all (you wouldn't join a call that was discussing it).  There's no harm or shame in not being interested in everything -- excluding the chairs, none of the current participants from the call have more than four +1s,
> and two only have one.
>
>
> ## Template
>
> Name:
> IRC Nick:
> Abstract Model:
> Vocabulary:
> Serialization:
> HTTP API:
> Client API:
> Robust Anchoring:
>
> The topics are described in the charter: http://www.w3.org/annotation/charter/
>
> Best,
>    RFID (Rob, Frederick, Ivan, Doug)
>
> --
> Rob Sanderson
> Technology Collaboration Facilitator
> Digital Library Systems and Services
> Stanford, CA 94305

Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 12:17:15 UTC