- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:49:32 +0200
- To: randall@bleeds.info
- Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 03:50:02 UTC
On 25 Sep 2014, at 24:47 , Randall Leeds <randall@bleeds.info> wrote: > Noticed this from the minutes (sorry I wasn't there today): > > | <fjh> we should explore automating pull of github for w3c archive as backup mechanism > > If people feel it's necessary or it's mandated by some process, we can ask around with the ASF infra team because I know they've got lots of tooling set up for GitHub mirrors. > > But also note that _everyone_ who clones the repo has an archive of the repo. That's DVCS :-D. So, while I think it's a valuable thing for long-term preservation, in the short term it's probably completely unnecessary from a disaster-recovery standpoint as long as any of us are actively involved in the project. I agree. I do not think we have a real danger as long as some people regularly update their local repository. I know I do it cca. once a week, so I have a complete copy on my disc automatically. Ivan ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 GPG: 0x343F1A3D WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 03:50:02 UTC