- From: Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:15:31 -0500
- To: "'W3C Public Annotation List'" <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5483534C5FA8464B881ED2184D98C0F61196741735@LCXCLMB03.LCDS.LOC.GOV>
Doug – to elaborate … the first picture in the model is this: [cid:image005.png@01CFFF65.6D2F9B50] This says unambiguously that an annotation, body, and target, are separate resources. I realize it says “An annotation is considered to be a set of connected resources, typically including a body and target,” which is inconsistent with the picture, and I would think one or the other needs to be changed. If we want an annotation to include the body and target, I would expect a picture like this … [cid:image006.png@01CFFF65.6D2F9B50] …. Which introduces a new resource type, AnnotationConnector. I would not object to changing the model as such, but it may be too late in the game. Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: Denenberg, Ray [mailto:rden@loc.gov] > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 4:41 PM > To: 'W3C Public Annotation List' > Subject: RE: [data-model] Proposed Abstract for Web Annotation Data > Model Spec > > > From: Doug Schepers > > I know other people who agree with your concept of what an annotation is, > > It's not my concept. It's what an annotation is. > > I'll let people who are much smarter than I am confirm this. > > Ray
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image005.png
- image/png attachment: image006.png
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2014 22:15:59 UTC