- From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 10:52:07 +0800
- To: 陳信屹 <tyson@slashlife.ai>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=Sp1MVo+=PQfgxWdDkAHSOhzSWuN1=G2Cjo_KPKaDSsEzg@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you Tyler if it sits above/outside of the KR concept map this means that it may not be relevant to this CG *where we are defining KR itself But let me argue with that. Nothing sits 'above' KR (feeling argumentative) As we continue to dynamically refine conceptual spaces, and our minds, as we are at it I wonder the following: - the interface specification you propose IS a type of KR *therefore IS a KR formalism *or is it not? if not why not? discuss - should there be a bubble somewhere in between for KR interfaces languages *this could be a novel contribution The degree of novelty and useful of such an idea would need to be evaluated P On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 10:23 AM 陳信屹 <tyson@slashlife.ai> wrote: > Hi > > For my agentic-execution interface specification, the relevant layer sits > above KR and below agent behavior: this is a Semantic Execution Layer, > where ontic categories become executable, auditable constraints for agents. > > My engineering model is: > > Ontology → Semantic Execution Layer → Agent Runtime → OS → TCP/IP or UDP → > Hardware Devices/Network protocol 。 > > In this architecture, ontology functions as institutional structure, while > the execution layer determines how those structures are enacted by agents. > > The Semantic Execution Layer is the architectural stratum that transforms > ontic or institutional structures into executable, auditable behavioral > constraints for agents. > > It operates above knowledge-representation formalisms and below agent > runtime systems, serving as the mechanism through which semantic > categories, roles, capabilities, and commitments are enacted as operational > rules within an agentic computing environment. > > Thx > > Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>於 2025年11月28日 週五,下午6:49寫道: > >> Thinking of where would Tyson's agentic execution interface specification >> would sit in the diagram, *presumably in the KR Language/Formalism bubble? >> I have extracted captured in a table and a list of terms most ontic >> categories, which is going to be our first deliverable, >> please give feedback, help to improve/expand. >> >> Please request access to view >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OyZGVDCMozbAGPaKqYpUnWX75raGoCNpd6KJN3bMoFQ/edit?usp=sharing >> >> [image: AI KR VOCABS NOV 2025 upper ont.jpg] >> >> >> >> Please request access if you would like to give feedback >> >
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: AI_KR_VOCABS_NOV_2025_upper_ont.jpg
Received on Saturday, 29 November 2025 02:52:51 UTC