Spatial KR, Synthetic Users, and “software as space” in K3D

Dear all,

Following the recent exchanges about spatial KR, domains of discourse, 
and the role of AI in standards, I’ve written up two short documents 
that may clarify the paradigm I’ve been trying to describe with K3D:

Spatial KR Visual Encoding
https://github.com/danielcamposramos/Knowledge3D/tree/main/docs/SPATIAL_KR_VISUAL_ENCODING.md

How domains of discourse, concepts, relations, modality, time and 
adequacy are encoded as stars, rays, Gardens and Museums.
How Galaxy, Knowledge Garden and Museum share one coordinate system and 
one set of visual semantics.
Software as Space & Web 4.0 – K3D Perspective
https://github.com/danielcamposramos/Knowledge3D/tree/main/docs/SOFTWARE_AS_SPACE_WEB4.md

How “software as space” and a Web 4.0 style of interaction emerge when 
Houses/Rooms/Doors/Galaxies/Gardens/Museums become the primary interface.
How AutoCAD‑class tools, games, and legacy web applications can live as 
Rooms and Doors, reusing existing web protocols.
How we model Synthetic Users (AI inhabitants) and Human Users with 
multiple avatars (PC/phone/AR/VR/BCI, blind/deaf/low‑mobility, etc.) as 
first‑class users of the same spatial OS.
The intent is to separate:

the KR layer (domains of discourse, vocabularies, spatial categories);
from the implementation layer (PTX/CUDA, WebXR, devices),
while making it clear how both humans and Synthetic Users (AI agents) 
cohabit the same spatial memory and act through the same 288‑byte action 
contract.
For anyone interested in how this relates to adequacy, domains of 
discourse, and the limits of scaling that Milton and Dave have raised, 
I’d be happy to iterate on these docs with you or map specific KR 
ontologies (SUMO/DOLCE/BFO, StratML, etc.) into the 
House/Galaxy/Garden/Museum structures.

Best regards,
Daniel