Re: K3D TPAC Presentation - Vocabulary Slide for Demo A

Thank you for sharing Daniel

As you may know, TPAC time is very valuable for attendees
So we need to make sure that even 15 minutes are spent appropriately
Every minute in fact counts

At this stage after a few exchanges with you I am not sure that what you
are offering has anything to do with what we are doing here yet
*not until you can scope it better or until we can understand it

I do not mean to say that your architecture is not valuable, I am just
saying
that the exchanges that we have had so far have not  been meaningful ,
although they are well formed
This is the case of syntax  without real semantics *well formed but
meaningless without context or with context
that may not be logically sound.   But hay, who am I.

I am concerned that you are maybe not clear yourself as to what  knowledge
representation is
nor how to pitch our work to this group
But do not worry, you are not alone in that. Looks like a great deal of
people, including senior experts
still do not know what KR is, and this is our mission here

Most people cannot open .md files, so I cannot tell what the .md file
contains
regarding the terms in the pptx file, they do not seem to represent the
spatial
domain in relation to AI
If they do, this is what you must explain

I asked a question: would the 3KD terms fit in the ODD space? *see the
diagram below
if so, please explain how so,  if not, then explain where does it belong?
[image: Copy of AI KR VOCABS 3DK INTERSECT(3).jpg]

If the vocabulary you are offering in the ppt is representing the spatial
domain knowledge
please give use case study. Explain what each term represents, how it is
used, how it was derived etc

if the vocabulary represents the architecture itself, or something else,
then this is not in scope of this CG, simply because nobody understand what
3KD is het nor how it relates here

As for the demo, you offered a demo showing how multiple llms can be
orchestrated
 to answer a query without API key,
I am not sure what you have in mind!   Please ensure that whatever you want
to demonstrate
has external validity *can be generalized and made relevant to real world
use cases
and of course it must be related to KR

If you intend to contribute vocabulary terms, please make sure they are
clearly defining the knowledge domain you are representing
with use cases, and if you plan to demo some useful novel LLM capability,
that would be great but make sure
you can explain it

Either way, it is great that you feel inclined to show up and show your kit
hopefully by continually refining your own thought process you ll produce
the few drops of nectar
that we may include in our overall distillate here, when we get to it

This is once again, something that we all must do, and have been doing over
the course of years and decades even

PDM

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 1:00 AM Daniel Ramos <capitain_jack@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> Dear Paola and AI KR CG members,
>
> As requested, please find attached the vocabulary slide for tomorrow's
> Demo A presentation (13 min + 2 min Q&A).
>
> The slide includes the 10 key terms that will be demonstrated through the
> browser-based MVCIC methodology.
>
> Looking forward to tomorrow's presentation and discussion.
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel Caldeira
> EchoSystems AI Studios
> Knowledge 3D (K3D) Project
>