- From: Milton Ponson <rwiciamsd@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 16:50:43 -0400
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+L6P4z2Wj6f2EU48Pqsa3_z4iEOuROhnng29r3GR+kBvcA72A@mail.gmail.com>
This is the main problem with AI today. Unfortunately putting legislation in place like in the European Union with the EU AI Act, Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act, General Data Protection Regulation isn't enough. What we need in addition is experts, scientists and independent media exposing the dangers and ethical issues involved in misuse of science and technologies. Effective communication about these issues is being targeted in the USA, as scientists, engineers, academics and academia and independent press media are being attacked for questioning government and corporate narratives. Big Tech in this context consists of Big Oil and Gas, who stand to gain from the explosive growth in energy demand from hyperspace data centers, Big Internet, AI and Semiconductor Tech and the data centers, for which a separate executive order was signed deregulating this industry to accommodate accelerated growth. And with the EPA removing the Endangerment Finding, which lays the foundation for the EPA to coordinate federal climate change action, the weakening of other environmental legislation for water, soil and wetlands, unlimited access to water and fossil fuel generated electric power is granted to data centers, which benefits all above mentioned "Big" industries. The problem in fact is three fold, (1) the assumption that generative LLM AI is the future is wrong, (2) massive expansion of energy grids and data center capacity is wrong and (3) the climate and environmental impacts of this industry will be ecologically and economically catastrophic. Very few people can effectively communicate this combination of issues. Finding experts, scientists and academics to tackle all three parts of the problem combined is the challenge. Milton Ponson Rainbow Warriors Core Foundation CIAMSD Institute-ICT4D Program +2977459312 PO Box 1154, Oranjestad Aruba, Dutch Caribbean On Tue, Aug 5, 2025, 13:14 David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: > Interesting work and commentary on the impact of AI on society: > > https://ainowinstitute.org/publications/research/executive-summary-artificial-power > > A quote from their executive summary: "Those of us broadly engaged in > challenging corporate consolidation, economic injustice, tech oligarchy, > and rising authoritarianism need to contend with the AI industry or we > will lose the end game. Accepting the current trajectory of AI > proselytized by Big Tech and its stenographers as “inevitable” is > setting us up on a path to an unenviable economic and political future—a > future that disenfranchises large sections of the public, renders > systems more obscure to those it affects, devalues our crafts, > undermines our security, and narrows our horizon for innovation." > > Any new technology brings a complex combination of positive and negative > impacts, and those with a vested interest in that technology inevitably > promote the positives while minimizing the negatives. I share the > authors' net concerns about the increasing consolidation of power that > the latest breed of mega AI brings. > > There is something particularly pernicious about the intersection of > unfettered capitalism, authoritarianism and big AI, which will > inevitably be used to further accelerate developments that are > increasingly harmful to society and our fragile planet. > > I am wondering what we can do, to help prevent these downsides. > > Thanks, > David Booth > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2025 20:51:01 UTC