- From: Milton Ponson <rwiciamsd@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:09:12 -0400
- To: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+L6P4ydwfaVdq90Dh+HoAsdK35yV=hVRR1iQmAE5LAfA+wnOg@mail.gmail.com>
Here is where we need to paint a large panoramic picture on a canvas of all elements from different disciplines. In order to do so we must canvass every single discipline involved. Like the physical canvassing of a neighborhood in our case we must systematically research by using systematic reviews, literature reviews and investigate standards which use glossaries or ontologies to come up with the elements for the big picture. It would be useful to come up with both formal and operational definitions of what constitutes knowledge and in which domains of discourse we want to do so. Milton Ponson Rainbow Warriors Core Foundation CIAMSD Institute-ICT4D Program +2977459312 PO Box 1154, Oranjestad Aruba, Dutch Caribbean On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 3:13 AM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote: > Milton, thank you > > It would be good to pick the KR terms which may not be present in AI, or > that are present in AI terms but specifically refer to KR > Adding to the challenge. Is there any term missing from the standard AI > glossaries that belong to KR? > For example many of the terms in the slides I sent earlier are not > included, and there are many other KR terms and concepts > abstraction , knowledge representation > > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 8:02 AM Milton Ponson <rwiciamsd@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You may want to look at: >> ISO/IEC DIS 22989(en) >> Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Artificial >> intelligence concepts and terminology >> https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:22989:dis:ed-1:v1:en >> >> The problem I have with KR for AI is that so many fields are converging >> in research on AI and KR for AI, and cognitive scientists, computational >> biologists, computer scientists, mathematicians and philosophers do not >> necessarily speak the same language. >> >> This is evident for reference management and bibliographical data >> management in scientific publications, but when we get down to talking >> about knowledge it gets very murky. >> >> Another source is: >> >> https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC129614/JRC129614_01.pdf >> >> Milton Ponson >> Rainbow Warriors Core Foundation >> CIAMSD Institute-ICT4D Program >> +2977459312 >> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad >> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 9:15 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Greetings AI KR CG >>> >>> In case someone is up for doing some homework, I think our KR glossary >>> of core terms could be useful if improved >>> even to a minimal set >>> >>> Today I struggled to remind myself and what ATMS stands for. Biological >>> hard drives do deprecate >>> >>> 1. JTMS (Justification-based Truth Maintenance Systems) >>> John Doyle “A Truth Maintenance System”, Artificial Intelligence >>> 12:231-272, 1979. >>> 2. ATMS (Assumption-based Truth Maintenance Systems) >>> Johan de Kleer, “An assumption-based TMS”, Artificial Intelligence, >>> 28:127–162, >>> 1986 >>> >>> https://elearning.di.unipi.it/pluginfile.php/19734/mod_resource/content/3/KRR-3.pdf >>> >>> I d like to finalize a glossary of terms in the next few months, and >>> publish it as a resource >>> Studying terminology is an excellent path to learning >>> anyone willing to study, learn and share their knowledge, please start >>> annotating on the wiki >>> thank you >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/wiki/Main_Page >>> >>
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2024 15:09:29 UTC