AI KR Strategist, explainabiilty, state of the art

Greetings All - It has been a while.

Given the interest in AI , I am proposing that we set up a series of online
meetings to expand on the AI Strategist work that focused on
leveraging StratML. (see attached).

The topics include:

   1. AI Observability Mechanisms (monitor behavior, data, and performance)
   2. KR Models used in the explanations (to a given audience, and what
   concepts are needed for this)
   3. KR ID needed for Knowledge Content (UID, URI) Logistics management
   4. Roles of Humans in the Loop (as a creator, and an audience type)
   5. Agents having Authority awarded by a Human in the Loop
   6. Catalogs of AI capabilities ( see Data Catalog (DCAT) Vocabulary
   <https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/> )
   7. AIKR Using / Used in DPROD (specification provides unambiguous and
   sharable semantics) https://ekgf.github.io/dprod/


Timeslots for meetings  will be determined by participants.  Please let me
know if you are interested.

Thanks

Carl Mattocks

CarlMattocks@WellnessIntelligence.Institute
It was a pleasure to clarify


On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 5:24 AM Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:

> First my thanks to Paola for this CG. I’m hoping we can attract more
> people with direct experience. Getting the CG noticed more widely is quite
> a challenge! Any suggestions?
>
> It has been proposed that without knowledge representation. there cannot
> be AI explainability
>
>
> That sounds somewhat circular as it presumes a shared understanding of
> what “AI explainability” is.  Humans can explain themselves in ways that
> are satisfactory to other humans.  We’re now seeing a similar effort to
> enable LLMs to explain themselves, despite having inscrutable internal
> representations as is also true for the human brain.
>
> I would therefore suggest that for explainability, knowledge
> representation is more about the models used in the explanations rather
> than in the internals of an AI system. Given that, we can discuss what
> kinds of explanations are effective to a given audience, and what concepts
> are needed for this.
>
> Explanations further relate to how to making an effective argument that
> convinces people to change their minds.  This also relates to the history
> of work on rhetoric, as well as to advertising and marketing!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>
>
>
>