- From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 12:43:18 +0100
- To: Peter Rivett <pete.rivett@federatedknowledge.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
Just for your ference Peter, ppl are still using xml to model scientific domains, https://github.com/NeuroML/NeuroML2/blob/master/Schemas/NeuroML2/NeuroML_v2.3.xsd is xml isnt it lI dont know how things end up being that way i ll work toward an xsd and json version of th file once it is in good shape shall ping On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 12:10 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you Peter, this is the feedback I was looking for > so > 1. first flesh the schema out (shall I just take out the labels that > refer to the modelc card instance and create schema type labels, more > generalized? I think there are a bunch of lines that dont need to be > there so I ll try to figure out but maybe you can guide them there > 2, then transform to JSON with your help (never done that but there is > always first time) > does that sound right? > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 9:16 AM Peter Rivett > <pete.rivett@federatedknowledge.com> wrote: > > > > Things have changed since I last published an xml schema > > > > Sad to say (as an XML and XSLT whizz myself), things have changed since XML itself was felt useful. > > Most people are now all about JSON and JSON Schema. See, for example https://blog.axway.com/learning-center/apis/api-management/why-json-won-over-xml > > > > I see Model Card seems to use YAML for its metadata https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/en/model-cards. And that's readily transformable to-from JSON with no loss. And can be validated with JSON Schema https://json-schema-everywhere.github.io/yaml > > > > BTW this file https://huggingface.co/STARBORN/modelcardML_V1/blob/main/MODELCARDML_V1.xml is not an XML Schema at all but what seems to be the HTML of the web page saved as a document in Open Office XML format. So you did convert the web page to XML but not an XML schema that could be used to validate Model Cards. > > > > Regards, > > Pete > > > > > > Pete Rivett (pete.rivett@federatedknowledge.com) > > Federated Knowledge, LLC (LEI 98450013F6D4AFE18E67) > > tel: +1-701-566-9534 > > Schedule a meeting at https://calendly.com/rivettp > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> > > Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 6:27 PM > > To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>; Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>; francois.remy@ugent.be <francois.remy@ugent.be> > > Subject: Model card ML v1 no brainer, no errors found > > > > Things have changed since I last published an xml schema, using foaf > > generator (cc Leigh Dodds!) > > > > Things have become faster, easier, I generated an xml schema for a model card > > https://huggingface.co/STARBORN/modelcardML_V1/tree/main > > > > following the process described below > > 1. found an annotate model card, scraped html > > https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/en/model-card-annotated > > > > 2. converted to xml using a cool tool (vertopal, thank you) > > > > 2. validated using another cool tool (vertopal) and xml validator > > No errors found > > > > Questions:, is this it? Is it useful? not useful? (either way, I may > > have a paper) <g> > > > > Can it be improved? > > are there any redundant elements or can it be modelled more meaningfullY > >
Received on Saturday, 2 March 2024 11:46:59 UTC