- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 04:22:20 +0100
- To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=Spca0Z_UhsR7FNY8LL9Ci5HJtu91keAOdZ6hVJYhrGrzw@mail.gmail.com>
AI is essential to perform computation over scientific datasets, yet representation is defined upstream (one step before) of AI itself The article below [1] provides a good background and brings up important questions on the notion of representation at large in science (the material that AI KR works with) In the same context, Also, essentially reinstating the purpose of this CG, is [2] Read, discuss *[1] Representation in scientific practice revisited 2014* https://www.academia.edu/8505481/Representation_in_scientific_practice_revisited_2014 As the first volume to bear the name Representation in Scientific Practice (Lynch and Woolgar 1990; hereafter, RiSP) demonstrated, representation involves lengthy struggles with research materials to reconstruct them in a way that facilitates analysis, for example through coding and highlighting key features of interest and aligning them with particular concepts and theories. This treatment of representation in and as practice has since spurred a rich body of ethnographic, historical, and discourse-analytic inquiries that demonstrate how the circumstances of knowledge production are folded into epistemological claims and ontological orderings [2] *Representation in AI Evaluations* https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3593013.3594019
Received on Sunday, 15 October 2023 03:23:04 UTC