KR for WoT

Thank you Luca, for sharing your work
I change the subject line of the thread for relevance.

 Would be good to start thinking in that direction.
 AI KR is primarily concerned with representation of K for the purpose of
supporting computation/automtion reasoning  in the contact of AI systems
(with a bunch of established computational tools and methods etc) There are
a few experts on that on this list

But in System Level KR (my thing) I recommend that simple human readable
explicit (natural language) designation of information is attached to any
computational KR, for the purpose of guaranteeing explainability, with all
its implications, as discussed elsewhere

So basically, we can start thinking of a simple level of
designation/description of information (as you suggest in your email below)
for WoT that could evolve into a more formalized KR if and when there is a
need for automation of reasoning over the things

Lets consider this an open task for the CG to handle, and let us know when
you may want more direct input

Until then
P


On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:50 PM Luca Barbato <luca.barbato@luminem.it>
wrote:

> On 13/10/23 11:36, Paola Di Maio wrote:
> > Apologies, Luca. I requested you to introduce yourself because I assumed
> > you had an internal meeting internal AI KR CC just ignore us :-) we now
> > have better understanding of the context and take this opportunity to
> say hi
> > Look forward to future opportunities to exchange
> >
>
> No problem:)
>
> I since one of my interests is making sure the WoT Thing Description can
> carry information about the real-world impact of connected Things[1],
> I'm sure your input and experience will be precious.
>
> lu
>
> [1]:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/main/USE-CASES/hazard-annotations.md
>
>