Re: weekend's reader

Milton, thanks for reply
 in the quest for truth, we embrace everything
and must accept paradoxes, however mind breaking that can be.
To some functional extent, we separate philosophy from technology and
science, but as we dig deeper into the latter, we always come to face
deeper philosophical questions.  Everything that we think or say happens to
fall under some paradigm or other.  Attempting to find answers to deeper
questions inevitable takes us into tangents.
There is a point when we start seeing all reality as one, that is a
critical point, Because our own ability to discriminate comes into
questions.  Quantum science pushes classical science into that direction.
Buddhism is based on paradigm of thought that can help to come to terms
qith quantum phenomena, this is why perhaps, many scientists are embracing
buddhism.  But there is also a time when we must completely abandon efforts
to conceptualize, because reality as a whole is well beyond the ordinary
ability to conceptualize.

 I think there is still a place for knowledge representation in attempting
to grasp reality as a whole, as long as we can cope with the challenges and
acknowledge limitations :-)

KR can definitely help to figure out the complexity of quantum science and
computing
 As for understanding ultimate truth, I am not sure :-)




On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 4:35 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Good point. But you may also then want to investigate quantum walks. And
> there are even papers lightly touching upon the links between quantum
> physics and Buddhist Madhyamaka philosophy.
> Why do I bring this up? Because in the knowledge representation for
> quantum computing and ontologies these will inevitably pop up.
>
>
>
> Milton Ponson
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>
>
> On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 01:32:05 AM AST, Paola Di Maio <
> paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>  QKR
>
> Greetings, good peoples
> Interesting article for discussion below, not without limitation, but
> still pointing to work to be done and a good  mid summer weekend read
>
> An Analysis of Ontological Entities to Represent
> Knowledge on Quantum Computing Algorithms
> and Implementations
> Abstract. The field of quantum computing is developing rapidly. As a
> result, a variety of quantum hardware, software development kits, and
> quantum algorithms have been developed in recent years. However, knowl-
> edge about these artifacts is either not available or spread among
> different
> sources. Thus, to analyze, compare, and evaluate knowledge on quantum
> computing an integrated knowledge base is required. In this paper, we
> introduce key concepts of an ontology for quantum algorithms and their
> implementations. The presented ontology serves as basis for a collabora-
> tive platform for researchers and practitioners to support collection and
> development of knowledge on the field of quantum computing.
> Keywords: Ontology, Taxonomy, Quantum Computing, Quantum Algorithm
> https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2836/qurator2021_paper_15.pdf
>