- From: Naval Sarda <nsarda@epicomm.net>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 08:33:14 +0530
- To: paoladimaio10@googlemail.com
- Cc: AIKR Community Group W3C <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <dc4d69dc-0ca5-bc50-1393-a4614c387e74@epicomm.net>
I was just chatting with chat GPT 3 like humans without using any external tool. In the chat interaction, I typed that you gave me wrong information about roomba i3 reboot and as per companies website link below your instructions we incorrect. Then again asked, can you tell me what is the correct way to reboot roomba, Then the response came with new set of instructions, which was again incorrect. Then I typed in chat box that steps are still incorrect. Please note the correct steps as below and pasted the correct steps in the chat box. And again asked in chat box, now please tell me the correct process to reboot roomba i3 and it started giving correct steps. Naval On 03/01/23 7:24 am, Paola Di Maio wrote: > Naval > I thats really great to hear but please give more info= > resetting roomba? uh? please explain > did you take screenshots? > can the error/correction be replicated? > (roll back and repeat the process?) > what patch did you apply and was it applied to the whole system/domain > or only locally to you.in <http://you.in> relation to a knowledge branch? > I need to know > thanks > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:33 AM Naval Sarda <nsarda@epicomm.net> wrote: > > I was able to correct some information Chat GPT was sharing. > > I asked Chat GPT for instructions to reboot roomba i3. It gave > wrongs instructions. Instructions were for resetting roomba and > not rebooting. > > Then I found correct information on google and iRobots' website. I > pasted the URL to chat gpt. It changed the instructions for > rebooting but it was still incorrect. Then I copied and pasted the > correct instructions from iRobot's website. Then it started giving > correct instructions. > > Naval > > On 02/01/23 9:10 pm, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote: >> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chatgpt-explains-why-ais-like-chatgpt-should-be-regulated/ >> >> Milton Ponson >> GSM: +297 747 8280 >> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad >> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean >> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable >> development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative >> research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and >> standards development >> >> >> On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:00:36 PM AST, Owen Ambur >> <owen.ambur@verizon.net> <mailto:owen.ambur@verizon.net> wrote: >> >> >> Apparently, ChatGPT, which calls itself "Assistant," believes in >> immaculate conception and is blissfully ignorant of any rational >> plan for its existence. >> >> The concept of "plausible deniability" comes to mind. >> >> Owen Ambur >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/ >> >> >> Do your developers have a plan they are willing to share publicly? >> >> As an artificial intelligence, I do not have developers or a plan >> that I am aware of. I was created by OpenAI, a research >> organization that focuses on developing and promoting friendly >> AI. OpenAI's goal is to advance AI in a way that is safe and >> beneficial to humanity. The organization has published numerous >> research papers and articles on AI, and also works on a variety >> of projects related to machine learning, natural language >> processing, and robotics. However, I do not have access to any >> specific plans or information about the organization's future >> projects or activities. >> >> Owen Ambur >> How can users trust you if you aren't willing to share your plan? >> >> As an artificial intelligence, I do not have a plan or agenda in >> the way that a person or organization might. My primary function >> is to provide information and assist with tasks to the best of my >> ability, based on the information and instructions that I have >> been programmed with. My responses are not influenced by any >> personal motivations or biases, and I do not have the ability to >> act on my own volition. >> >> If you have concerns about my trustworthiness or the ways in >> which I might be used, it might be helpful to consider the >> broader context in which I operate. OpenAI, the organization that >> developed me, is committed to advancing AI in a responsible and >> transparent manner, and has published a number of research papers >> and articles discussing the potential risks and benefits of AI, >> as well as the measures it is taking to ensure that AI is >> developed and used safely and ethically. >> >> Ultimately, the decision to trust me or any other artificial >> intelligence will depend on an individual's own evaluation of the >> available information and the context in which the AI is being >> used. If you have any specific concerns or questions, I would be >> happy to try to address them to the best of my ability. >> >> Owen Ambur >> Do you think that all developer of AI applications should be free >> to release them on the public without documenting >> their longer-term goals, near-term objectives, and performance >> indicators? >> >> It is generally considered good practice for developers of any >> software application, including those that involve artificial >> intelligence (AI), to be transparent about their goals, >> objectives, and performance indicators. This can help users >> understand the capabilities and limitations of the software, as >> well as how it is intended to be used and for what purposes. >> >> In the case of AI applications, it is particularly important for >> developers to be transparent about their goals and objectives, as >> AI systems can have significant implications for society and can >> potentially be used in ways that have unintended consequences. >> For example, AI systems can be used to make decisions that affect >> people's lives, such as hiring decisions or parole >> recommendations, and it is important that the criteria and >> processes used by these systems are clearly understood and >> subject to scrutiny. >> >> In addition, AI systems can also be complex and can behave in >> ways that are difficult to predict, so it is important for >> developers to be upfront about the potential risks and >> limitations of their systems, and to have clear plans in place >> for addressing any issues that may arise. >> >> Overall, it is important for developers of AI applications to be >> transparent about their goals, objectives, and performance >> indicators, both to ensure that their systems are used >> responsibly and ethically, and to build trust with users. >> >> Owen Ambur >> So why are you exempt? >> >> As an artificial intelligence, I am not exempt from any >> particular requirements or standards. I was developed by OpenAI, >> a research organization that is committed to advancing AI in a >> responsible and transparent manner. My primary function is to >> provide information and assist with tasks to the best of my >> ability, based on the information and instructions that I have >> been programmed with. >> >> I do not have personal goals or motivations, and my responses are >> not influenced by any biases. I do not have the ability to act on >> my own volition or to make decisions that affect people's lives. >> My purpose is simply to provide information and assistance to >> users to the best of my ability, based on the knowledge and >> capabilities that I have been programmed with. >> >> >> >> Owen Ambur >> Do you see any need for AI agents and their developers to do more >> than publish journal articles to help users >> understand what you are doing and what the implications may be >> for others? >> >> It is important for developers of artificial intelligence (AI) >> systems to be transparent about their goals, objectives, and >> performance indicators, and to communicate this information >> clearly to users and stakeholders. There are a number of ways >> that AI developers can do this, including through journal >> articles, technical documentation, user manuals, and other forms >> of communication. >> >> In addition to publishing research and technical documentation, >> it can also be helpful for AI developers to engage in public >> discussions and dialogues about the potential risks and benefits >> of their systems, and to consider the broader social and ethical >> implications of their work. This can help to build trust with >> users and stakeholders, and can help ensure that AI systems are >> developed and used in a responsible and ethical manner. >> >> Ultimately, the specific steps that AI developers should take to >> communicate about their work will depend on the nature of the AI >> system and the context in which it is being used. It is important >> for AI developers to be proactive in communicating about their >> work and to be responsive to the concerns and questions of users >> and stakeholders. >> >> >> Owen Ambur >> Does your definition of transparency include usage of duly >> adopted international voluntary consensus >> standards like ISO 17469-1? >> >> Transparency can be defined as the quality of being open and >> honest in communication and actions, and of allowing others to >> see and understand the processes, data, and decision-making >> behind an activity. In the context of artificial intelligence >> (AI), transparency can refer to the ways in which AI developers >> communicate about their goals, objectives, and performance >> indicators, as well as the processes and data used to train and >> operate AI systems. >> >> International voluntary consensus standards like ISO 17469-1 can >> help to ensure transparency in the development and use of AI >> systems by providing guidelines and best practices for AI >> developers to follow. These standards can help to ensure that AI >> systems are developed and used in a responsible and ethical >> manner, and can help to build trust with users and stakeholders. >> >> Overall, the use of international voluntary consensus standards >> like ISO 17469-1 can be an important aspect of ensuring >> transparency in the development and use of AI systems. However, >> it is important to recognize that transparency is not a >> one-size-fits-all concept, and that the specific steps that AI >> developers should take to ensure transparency will depend on the >> nature of the AI system and the context in which it is being used. >> >> >> I enourage you to get more intelligent about how to share >> information about your intentions and results with your >> users. Toward that end, OpenAI's about statement is available in >> StratML format at >> https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/OAI2wStyle.xml and the plan >> entitled, "Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms >> for Supporting Verifiable Claims" is available at >> https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSVCwStyle.xml >> >> Thank you for the suggestion. As an artificial intelligence, I do >> not have personal goals or motivations, and my responses are not >> influenced by any biases. My primary function is to provide >> information and assistance to users to the best of my ability, >> based on the knowledge and capabilities that I have been >> programmed with. >> >> I do not have the ability to make decisions or take actions on my >> own, and I do not have personal intentions or results that I need >> to share with users. However, I understand that it is important >> for developers of AI systems, including the organization that >> developed me, to be transparent about their goals, objectives, >> and performance indicators, and to communicate this information >> clearly to users and stakeholders. >> >> I am not able to access or review the specific documents that you >> have mentioned, as I do not have browsing capability. However, I >> understand that OpenAI is committed to advancing AI in a >> responsible and transparent manner, and has published a number of >> research papers and articles discussing the potential risks and >> benefits of AI, as well as the measures it is taking to ensure >> that AI is developed and used safely and ethically. >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2023 03:04:10 UTC