Re: My Chat with ChatGPT

I was able to correct some information Chat GPT was sharing.

I asked Chat GPT for instructions to reboot roomba i3. It gave wrongs 
instructions. Instructions were for resetting roomba and not rebooting.

Then I found correct information on google and iRobots' website. I 
pasted the URL to chat gpt. It changed the instructions for rebooting 
but it was still incorrect. Then I copied and pasted the correct 
instructions from iRobot's website. Then it started giving correct 
instructions.

Naval

On 02/01/23 9:10 pm, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote:
> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chatgpt-explains-why-ais-like-chatgpt-should-be-regulated/
>
> Milton Ponson
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development 
> to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on 
> applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>
>
> On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:00:36 PM AST, Owen Ambur 
> <owen.ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
> Apparently, ChatGPT, which calls itself "Assistant," believes in 
> immaculate conception and is blissfully ignorant of any rational plan 
> for its existence.
>
> The concept of "plausible deniability" comes to mind.
>
> Owen Ambur
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/
>
>
> Do your developers have a plan they are willing to share publicly?
>
> As an artificial intelligence, I do not have developers or a plan that 
> I am aware of. I was created by OpenAI, a research organization that 
> focuses on developing and promoting friendly AI. OpenAI's goal is to 
> advance AI in a way that is safe and beneficial to humanity. The 
> organization has published numerous research papers and articles on 
> AI, and also works on a variety of projects related to machine 
> learning, natural language processing, and robotics. However, I do not 
> have access to any specific plans or information about the 
> organization's future projects or activities.
>
> Owen Ambur
> How can users trust you if you aren't willing to share your plan?
>
> As an artificial intelligence, I do not have a plan or agenda in the 
> way that a person or organization might. My primary function is to 
> provide information and assist with tasks to the best of my ability, 
> based on the information and instructions that I have been programmed 
> with. My responses are not influenced by any personal motivations or 
> biases, and I do not have the ability to act on my own volition.
>
> If you have concerns about my trustworthiness or the ways in which I 
> might be used, it might be helpful to consider the broader context in 
> which I operate. OpenAI, the organization that developed me, is 
> committed to advancing AI in a responsible and transparent manner, and 
> has published a number of research papers and articles discussing the 
> potential risks and benefits of AI, as well as the measures it is 
> taking to ensure that AI is developed and used safely and ethically.
>
> Ultimately, the decision to trust me or any other artificial 
> intelligence will depend on an individual's own evaluation of the 
> available information and the context in which the AI is being used. 
> If you have any specific concerns or questions, I would be happy to 
> try to address them to the best of my ability.
>
> Owen Ambur
> Do you think that all developer of AI applications should be free to 
> release them on the public without documenting
> their longer-term goals, near-term objectives, and performance indicators?
>
> It is generally considered good practice for developers of any 
> software application, including those that involve artificial 
> intelligence (AI), to be transparent about their goals, objectives, 
> and performance indicators. This can help users understand the 
> capabilities and limitations of the software, as well as how it is 
> intended to be used and for what purposes.
>
> In the case of AI applications, it is particularly important for 
> developers to be transparent about their goals and objectives, as AI 
> systems can have significant implications for society and can 
> potentially be used in ways that have unintended consequences. For 
> example, AI systems can be used to make decisions that affect people's 
> lives, such as hiring decisions or parole recommendations, and it is 
> important that the criteria and processes used by these systems are 
> clearly understood and subject to scrutiny.
>
> In addition, AI systems can also be complex and can behave in ways 
> that are difficult to predict, so it is important for developers to be 
> upfront about the potential risks and limitations of their systems, 
> and to have clear plans in place for addressing any issues that may arise.
>
> Overall, it is important for developers of AI applications to be 
> transparent about their goals, objectives, and performance indicators, 
> both to ensure that their systems are used responsibly and ethically, 
> and to build trust with users.
>
> Owen Ambur
> So why are you exempt?
>
> As an artificial intelligence, I am not exempt from any particular 
> requirements or standards. I was developed by OpenAI, a research 
> organization that is committed to advancing AI in a responsible and 
> transparent manner. My primary function is to provide information and 
> assist with tasks to the best of my ability, based on the information 
> and instructions that I have been programmed with.
>
> I do not have personal goals or motivations, and my responses are not 
> influenced by any biases. I do not have the ability to act on my own 
> volition or to make decisions that affect people's lives. My purpose 
> is simply to provide information and assistance to users to the best 
> of my ability, based on the knowledge and capabilities that I have 
> been programmed with.
>
>
>
> Owen Ambur
> Do you see any need for AI agents and their developers to do more than 
> publish journal articles to help users
> understand what you are doing and what the implications may be for others?
>
> It is important for developers of artificial intelligence (AI) systems 
> to be transparent about their goals, objectives, and performance 
> indicators, and to communicate this information clearly to users and 
> stakeholders. There are a number of ways that AI developers can do 
> this, including through journal articles, technical documentation, 
> user manuals, and other forms of communication.
>
> In addition to publishing research and technical documentation, it can 
> also be helpful for AI developers to engage in public discussions and 
> dialogues about the potential risks and benefits of their systems, and 
> to consider the broader social and ethical implications of their work. 
> This can help to build trust with users and stakeholders, and can help 
> ensure that AI systems are developed and used in a responsible and 
> ethical manner.
>
> Ultimately, the specific steps that AI developers should take to 
> communicate about their work will depend on the nature of the AI 
> system and the context in which it is being used. It is important for 
> AI developers to be proactive in communicating about their work and to 
> be responsive to the concerns and questions of users and stakeholders.
>
>
> Owen Ambur
> Does your definition of transparency include usage of duly adopted 
> international voluntary consensus
> standards like ISO 17469-1?
>
> Transparency can be defined as the quality of being open and honest in 
> communication and actions, and of allowing others to see and 
> understand the processes, data, and decision-making behind an 
> activity. In the context of artificial intelligence (AI), transparency 
> can refer to the ways in which AI developers communicate about their 
> goals, objectives, and performance indicators, as well as the 
> processes and data used to train and operate AI systems.
>
> International voluntary consensus standards like ISO 17469-1 can help 
> to ensure transparency in the development and use of AI systems by 
> providing guidelines and best practices for AI developers to follow. 
> These standards can help to ensure that AI systems are developed and 
> used in a responsible and ethical manner, and can help to build trust 
> with users and stakeholders.
>
> Overall, the use of international voluntary consensus standards like 
> ISO 17469-1 can be an important aspect of ensuring transparency in the 
> development and use of AI systems. However, it is important to 
> recognize that transparency is not a one-size-fits-all concept, and 
> that the specific steps that AI developers should take to ensure 
> transparency will depend on the nature of the AI system and the 
> context in which it is being used.
>
>
> I enourage you to get more intelligent about how to share information 
> about your intentions and results with your
> users. Toward that end, OpenAI's about statement is available in 
> StratML format at
> https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/OAI2wStyle.xml and the plan entitled, 
> "Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms
> for Supporting Verifiable Claims" is available at 
> https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSVCwStyle.xml
>
> Thank you for the suggestion. As an artificial intelligence, I do not 
> have personal goals or motivations, and my responses are not 
> influenced by any biases. My primary function is to provide 
> information and assistance to users to the best of my ability, based 
> on the knowledge and capabilities that I have been programmed with.
>
> I do not have the ability to make decisions or take actions on my own, 
> and I do not have personal intentions or results that I need to share 
> with users. However, I understand that it is important for developers 
> of AI systems, including the organization that developed me, to be 
> transparent about their goals, objectives, and performance indicators, 
> and to communicate this information clearly to users and stakeholders.
>
> I am not able to access or review the specific documents that you have 
> mentioned, as I do not have browsing capability. However, I understand 
> that OpenAI is committed to advancing AI in a responsible and 
> transparent manner, and has published a number of research papers and 
> articles discussing the potential risks and benefits of AI, as well as 
> the measures it is taking to ensure that AI is developed and used 
> safely and ethically.
>
>