> On 20 Nov 2022, at 17:43, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> It seems that synchronization between CogAI, AIKR and this new to be created CG is in order.
> After having run through dozens of threads in the AIKR list, suggestions by Paola di Maio, Owen Ambur and constructive comments of Dave Raggett, Mike Bergman et alii, and recent articles it is becoming crystal clear and manifest that open, explainable, inclusive and ethical AI can only be achieved by combining elements of planning in machine readable format, categorization or classification of areas of activity, using library coding systems and commercial classification codes for economic activities, and classification systems in specific fields (e.g. like exist in mathematics, computer science and some physical sciences) to narrow down in which area of activity AI will be used.
Can you justify that or is it just a leap of faith? I would appreciate intellectual rigour to ensure arguments are well grounded.
For instance, you need to explain what you mean by the terms you’ve used, e.g. what does it take for AI to be open? Perhaps you have some ideas for the kind of terms and conditions required for others to reuse an AI model?
What criteria make something “explainable”? Good explanations depend on the audience, and a technical explanation is unsatisfactory for non-technical people.
Similar questions applied to “inclusive" and to “ethical" in respect to AI.
It is also big jump to requiring planning and library coding systems.
You may want to take a look at the EU regulatory framework for AI, see: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai which is intended guarantee the safety and fundamental rights of people and businesses when it comes to AI. And, they will strengthen uptake, investment and innovation in AI across the EU. As AI is a fast evolving technology, the proposal has a future-proof approach, allowing rules to adapt to technological change.
More rigour, less leaps of faith ...
Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>