- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:14:22 +0800
- To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=Spbvd8XU8aK5=KE=sNGuYrqKhBmC1r5ySdb_qe7qwfbMg@mail.gmail.com>
Much to dig into for those interested to continue to learn Let us be reminded for a moment of Transcendental Truth https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19111996/ > *although the ultimate scientific authority of a transcendental value of > truth was a view held almost universally by the greatest scientists > throughout recorded history, modern science has all-but banished references > to truth from professional scientific discourse * > Despite being the working model for intelligence, humans can choose selectively to not apply it . Why do intelligent humans sometimes behave unintelligently? * just take a look at history and the current state of world affairs for a plethora of examples. Because of ego, pride and ignorance can dim this otherwise innate intellectual quality I am reading about prescission - further exploring the pointer provided by Mike in the earlier mail, so sharing it here (yes, middle of the night, sore eyes) An introductory article http://www.commens.org/encyclopedia/article/gava-gabriele-prescissi > > *But precision is not thus reciprocal; but on the contrary it is > frequently the case that though A cannot be prescinded from B, B can be > prescinded from A” * > *note by P*DM: this is seen in some type of relations, where the child cannot possibly exist without a parent. not viceversa More in detail https://philpapers.org/rec/GAVPPA Peirce’s ‘Prescision’ as a Transcendental Method <https://philpapers.org/go.pl?id=GAVPPA&proxyId=&u=https%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1080%2F09672559.2011.561614> Gabriele Gava <https://philpapers.org/s/Gabriele%20Gava> > prescision is similar to some abstracting procedure that Immanuel Kant > used in his Critique of Pure Reason. The transcendental method is foundational to sciences https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039368112000817 Free energy and active inference The abstract only is open for this paper, but its enough to get the gist Friston K, Kilner J, Harrison L (2006) A free energy principle for the brain. J Physiol Paris 100(1–3):70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.10.001 more on the topic https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-022-09864-z *Active inference*, whose most famous tenet is the *free energy principle*, purports to unify explanations in biology and cognitive science under a single class of mathematical models. (May or may not agree)
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2022 18:16:44 UTC