- From: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 13:47:51 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Owen Ambur <owen.ambur@verizon.net>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <1979773575.107362.1667656071079@mail.yahoo.com>
I suspect that if we want to define attainable goals in order to establish which problems need solving and what technologies are needed to do so, we are back to the post in which I mentioned that the sustainable development goals of the UN (SDGs) need just that. Owen Ambur correctly indicated that the SDGs are not adequate input for a conversion into StratML format. The main problem with converting treaties, conventions, programs and so forth adopted by the UN is that they are negotiated by bureaucrats and diplomats and consequently not in an strategic planning format which defines the problems at hand, scope, relevant parameters, objectives, goals as input for desired outcomes. The following is indicative of why this happens: International treaties have mostly failed to produce their intended effects https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2122854119 The language used in UN documents and for that matter most public government documents on earth does not have any adequate knowledge representation and reasoning formats. Unfortunately we do not have any NLP AI to do just that as well. This is why the current state of the art is actually bits and pieces of technology all over the place serving the industries most in need or best served by using AI and consequently KR&R. Working on this problem we may be able to inspire some tech giants to come up with just the tools needed. Milton PonsonGSM: +297 747 8280 PO Box 1154, Oranjestad Aruba, Dutch Caribbean Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 08:45:20 AM AST, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: On 4 Nov 2022, at 18:30, Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: Whereas Dave says "the focus is on what is needed to solve different kinds of complex tasks," I'd suggest in slightly different wording that the focus should be on achieving human goals and objectives. If the goals and objectives are very high level, I don’t see how they will be useful in directing the technical research, e.g. solve world peace and happiness for all, doesn’t provide anything concrete for technical challenges in machine learning and reasoning, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 5 November 2022 13:48:16 UTC