- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:10:25 +0000
- To: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <A324199B-19D1-42A2-8679-8EB3F6E64671@w3.org>
I disagree as most definitions of logic involve symbols, see, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic You really need to define KR rather than leaving that implicit and uncertain. > On 4 Nov 2022, at 10:48, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dave, > even the NN you point ot uses logic/KR to figure out there is a mismatch between the lip movement and the words. I think you are simply confirming the point > that even ML needs KR > > PDM > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 6:30 PM Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> wrote: >> >> >>> On 3 Nov 2022, at 21:32, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com <mailto:paoladimaio10@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> how to use KR to identify Deepfakes (short answer: by using logic) >> >> That isn’t accurate, as it is possible to train neural networks to spot deep fakes by looking for clues that suggest machine generated images and video frames, see: >> >> https://hai.stanford.edu/news/using-ai-detect-seemingly-perfect-deep-fake-videos >> >> The article notes that this will get harder over time as the generators get better. >> >> Logic isn’t needed for this and the KR is implicit in the network architecture and training data. >> >> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> >> >> >> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 4 November 2022 11:10:39 UTC