- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 11:00:34 +0800
- To: ontolog-forum <ontolog-forum@googlegroups.com>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SoOCnvu1oavp2w4wMbSs_D-7tMviJrfBc3KUX2puMCb8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Greetings folks a while back I posted a note about some research I am doing in KR and neuroscience, but cannot find the link to the online archive so reposting it In 2019 I gave a short talk at Brain Informatics 2019 in Haikou China, and then again at virtual conference in 2020 https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vSSIOll5tyqUpdunl_vdJ5MUL1e9sRqiHviVT9c2cn92sKcU4qHDJ0G6WcIzWhVbMe0ufNhDSeyt7eQ/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=5000 One of the key findings I presented in these two talks , motivating my research interest in this space, is that I could not find any clear correspondence between ANNs (artificial neural networks ) and BNN (Biological nn) (trying to re-sue the KR constructs fromo BNN to apply to to ANN, it failed) Today, I read this article where the authors - who do not cite me - #pfui *t might be necessary to rethink the old tradition of loosely comparing a neuron in the brain to a neuron in the context of machine learning.* https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-computationally-complex-is-a-single-neuron-20210902/ what this article demonstrates taht 1) many individuals cited as leading scientists,are petty thieves, and the scientific establishment that supports them are fraudulent and 2)my empirical finding presented in 2019 have been validated :-) your truly PDM <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> <#m_5572950065832953882_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Received on Monday, 6 September 2021 03:01:26 UTC