- From: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:05:02 -0400
- To: Kilian Kunst <kilian@idni.org>, carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
- Cc: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>, paul alagna <PJAlagna@gmail.com>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <b6c54d58-7e55-fff6-c833-46eadf082c09@verizon.net>
The DMAIC process is now documented in StratML format at
https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#DMAIC
These goals and objectives are very closely related to the purposes of
the StratML standard:
1.1: Charters
<https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMAICwStyle.xml#_1d3a448a-fdb3-11ea-93d8-b6561c83ea00>
- Compile project charters to define the focus, scope, direction,
and motivation for the improvement teams
Charters should be created and maintained as performance plans in an
open, standard, machine-readable format like StratML Part 2.
1.2: Customer Needs
<https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMAICwStyle.xml#_1d3a450c-fdb3-11ea-93d8-b6561c83ea00>
- Consider the voice of the customers to understand feedback from
current and future customers indicating offerings that satisfy,
delight, and dissatisfy them
Facilitating and enhancing the focus and productivity of input and
feedback is among the purposes of the StratML standard.
Goal 2: Metrics
<https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMAICwStyle.xml#_1d3a461a-fdb3-11ea-93d8-b6561c83ea00>
- Measure process performance.
Performance metrics should be gathered and reported in an open,
standard, machine-readable format.
5.1: Plan
<https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMAICwStyle.xml#_1d3a50a6-fdb3-11ea-93d8-b6561c83ea00>
- Compile and implement a quality control plan to document what is
needed to keep an improved process at its current level
Quality control plans should apply an open data standard for performance
plans.
IDNI's about statement is also available in StratML format, at
https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IDNI
Owen
On 9/23/2020 11:37 AM, Kilian Kunst wrote:
> That's right. We speak about the Internet of Languages in our whitepaper:
>
> After establishing the logics that support laws, we have to come down
> to a concrete language. However we reject the concept of “universal
> language” and postulate that no single language is adequate for all
> purposes. We acknowledge that many languages should not only coexist
> and be mutually interchangeable, but they should also have the ability
> to evolve with time. We therefore come up with a meta-language that is
> capable of defining new languages, but then, one might claim that we
> solved nothing, and even though we reject the idea of universal
> language, we still came up with a universal metalanguage. To this end
> we require the meta-language to be able to self-interpret and by that
> redefine itself and change with time. We therefore achieve a situation
> in which the choice of language doesn’t matter while even the
> meta-language is not fixed. The internet of languages is therefore a
> set of translators. It is important to note that we do not at all
> consider translations or even processing of natural languages, and our
> scope is restricted to formal languages. Once a translator from
> language X to language Y is written and submitted into the internet of
> languages, and similarly a translator from language Y to language Z,
> we then get a translator from X to Z “for free”. This gives rise to
> calling it an “internet” of languages.
>
>
> created with MySignature.io <https://mysignature.io/?utm_source=logo>
> Kilian Kunst
> Community Manager | Intelligent Decentralized Networks Initiatives LTD
> site: www.IDNI.org <http://www.idni.org/>
> email: Kilian@idni.org <mailto:Kilian@idni.org>
>
>
> created with MySignature.io <https://twitter.com/TauChainOrg>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:44 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com
> <mailto:carlmattocks@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Communities (CoInterest / CoPractice / CoResults) are not always
> bureaucratic organizations ..some have schemas (& taxonomies)
> that add structure to discussions. As does DMAIC - by ordering the
> topics to be acted upon.. Hopefully this can be true for Tau
> Communities.
>
> When the Tau community intends to make changes to the network
> code, rules or protocols, they will simply need to express these
> opinions and perspectives in a compatible language over the
> network. The self defining logic of the Tau blockchain network
> will enable it to detect the consensus among these opinions and
> automatically amend its own code to reflect this consensus from
> block to block. https://www.idni.org/
>
>
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:11 PM Paola Di Maio
> <paola.dimaio@gmail.com <mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> what I mean is that six sigma and other related methods
> are organisational praocesses, ie are applied within a closed
> system
>
> the development of KR however is distributed, and cognition
> does not work as a bureaucratic organisation
> the entire KR lifecycle does not typically happens (afaik)
> within a closed system and involves entities (such as
> cognition, interpretation)
> which are not bureaucratic,
>
> But it could be interesting to see how such a management
> process can be applied to the outcome of a mixed knowledge
> lifecycle process such as KR, Maybe that process/schema
> should evolve further as well
>
> P
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 9:50 AM Paola Di Maio
> <paola.dimaio@gmail.com <mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thank you
>
> I think it makes sense to apply quality management
> processes to KR (if I understand you right)
>
> Wonder perhaps if it is worth to clarify further how this
> process (which is an organisational tool)
> can be applied to the knowledge lifecycle (from cognition
> to artefact)
>
> p
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 1:10 AM carl mattocks
> <carlmattocks@gmail.com <mailto:carlmattocks@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Regarding our discussion today about schema for
> 'publishing knowledge (representation)' that would
> have same multi-level Value Chain based on Strategies
> & [exploration, exploitation and evaluation]....
> note: you messaged : The "
> knowledge-value_chain_A_conceptual_framework " is now
> available in StratML format at
> https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#KVC
>
> The mission, vision, goals and strategies of a public
> health organization or social enterprise drive the
> knowledge-value chain. The higher the knowledge
> performance related to dyadic capabilities, the higher
> the value generated (Fig. 1).
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6869769_The_knowledge-value_chain_A_conceptual_framework_for_knowledge_translation_in_health
>
>
> For consideration I also propose that ... to introduce
> Knowledge (representation) Quality controls we would
> use Exploration / Exploitation / Evaluation in a
> matrix cross-checking with Define, measure, analyze,
> improve, and control (DMAIC) ..a data-driven quality
> strategy used to improve processes. .. It is an
> integral part of a Six Sigma
> <https://asq.org/quality-resources/six-sigma> initiative,
> but in general can be implemented as a standalone
> quality improvement procedure or as part of other
> process improvement initiatives such as lean
> <https://asq.org/quality-resources/lean>.
>
>
> KRVC/Quality Exploration Exploitation Evaluation
> Define
> Measure
> Analyze
> Improve
> Control
>
>
> Define the problem, improvement activity, opportunity
> for improvement, the project goals, and customer
> (internal and external) requirements.
> Project charter to define the focus, scope, direction,
> and motivation for the improvement team
> Voice of the customer to understand feedback from
> current and future customers indicating offerings that
> satisfy, delight, and dissatisfy them
> Value stream map to provide an overview of an entire
> process, starting and finishing at the customer, and
> analyzing what is required to meet customer needs
> Measure process performance.
> Process map for recording the activities performed as
> part of a process
> Capability analysis to assess the ability of a process
> to meet specifications
> Pareto chart to analyze the frequency of problems or
> causes
> Analyze the process to determine root causes of
> variation and poor performance (defects).
> Root cause analysis (RCA) to uncover causes
> Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for
> identifying possible product, service, and process
> failures
> Multi-vari chart to detect different types of
> variation within a process
> Improve process performance by addressing and
> eliminating the root causes.
> Design of experiments (DOE) to solve problems from
> complex processes or systems where there are many
> factors influencing the outcome and where it is
> impossible to isolate one factor or variable from the
> others
> Kaizen event to introduce rapid change by focusing on
> a narrow project and using the ideas and motivation of
> the people who do the work
> Control the improved process and future process
> performance.
> Quality control plan to document what is needed to
> keep an improved process at its current level
> Statistical process control (SPC) for monitoring
> process behavior
> */Balanced Scoring/* (my edit) to create a workplace
> suited for visual control
> Mistake proofing (poka-yoke) to make errors impossible
> or immediately detectable
>
> cheers
>
> Carl
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *carl mattocks* <carlmattocks@gmail.com
> <mailto:carlmattocks@gmail.com>>
> Date: Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM
> Subject: Re: AIKR Value Chain
> To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org
> <mailto:public-aikr@w3.org>>
> Cc: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com
> <mailto:paoladimaio10@gmail.com>>, Chris Fox
> <chris@chriscfox.com <mailto:chris@chriscfox.com>>,
> Paul Alagna <pjalagna@gmail.com
> <mailto:pjalagna@gmail.com>>, Justin Stoltzfus
> <stoltz_sj@hotmail.com
> <mailto:stoltz_sj@hotmail.com>>, Jorge Sanchez.
> <jorgesr@zoho.eu <mailto:jorgesr@zoho.eu>>, Owen Ambur
> <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>>
>
>
>
> Confirming that the AI KR value chain will be
> the focus of our next meeting on September 15 (invite
> to be sent separately).
> In addition to ITIF's model (see below), as a
> use-case please review The knowledge-value chain: A
> conceptual framework for knowledge translation in
> health (Bulletin of the World Health Organisation ).
> In particular, please peruse fig1. The mission,
> vision, goals and strategies of a public health
> organization or social enterprise drive the
> knowledge-value chain. The higher the knowledge
> performance related to dyadic capabilities, the higher
> the value generated (Fig. 1).
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6869769_The_knowledge-value_chain_A_conceptual_framework_for_knowledge_translation_in_health
>
>
> have a great weekend
>
> Carl Mattocks
> co-chair AIKRCG
>
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:30 PM Owen Ambur
> <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net
> <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote:
>
> Carl, at the end of our televideo conference
> earlier today you indicated intent to focus on the
> value chain at our next meeting on September 15.
> So I thought you might like to see this objective
> in ITIF's model for long-term U.S./Western
> revitalization (in competition with China):
>
> ...........
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2020 16:05:20 UTC