- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:10:36 +0800
- To: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
- Cc: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>, paul alagna <PJAlagna@gmail.com>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SpYZKeJp2Lk8TkzUc55FNR6zM6vQJF-sKAac_hWQUtcTQ@mail.gmail.com>
what I mean is that six sigma and other related methods are organisational praocesses, ie are applied within a closed system the development of KR however is distributed, and cognition does not work as a bureaucratic organisation the entire KR lifecycle does not typically happens (afaik) within a closed system and involves entities (such as cognition, interpretation) which are not bureaucratic, But it could be interesting to see how such a management process can be applied to the outcome of a mixed knowledge lifecycle process such as KR, Maybe that process/schema should evolve further as well P On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 9:50 AM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you > > I think it makes sense to apply quality management processes to KR (if I > understand you right) > > Wonder perhaps if it is worth to clarify further how this process (which > is an organisational tool) > can be applied to the knowledge lifecycle (from cognition to artefact) > > p > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 1:10 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Regarding our discussion today about schema for 'publishing knowledge >> (representation)' that would have same multi-level Value Chain based on >> Strategies & [exploration, exploitation and evaluation].... >> note: you messaged : The " >> knowledge-value_chain_A_conceptual_framework " is now available in >> StratML format at https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#KVC >> >> The mission, vision, goals and strategies of a public health >> organization or social enterprise drive the knowledge-value chain. The >> higher the knowledge performance related to dyadic capabilities, the higher >> the value generated (Fig. 1). >> >> >> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6869769_The_knowledge-value_chain_A_conceptual_framework_for_knowledge_translation_in_health >> >> >> For consideration I also propose that ... to introduce Knowledge >> (representation) Quality controls we would use Exploration / Exploitation / >> Evaluation in a matrix cross-checking with Define, measure, analyze, >> improve, and control (DMAIC) ..a data-driven quality strategy used to >> improve processes. .. It is an integral part of a Six Sigma >> <https://asq.org/quality-resources/six-sigma> initiative, but in general >> can be implemented as a standalone quality improvement procedure or as part >> of other process improvement initiatives such as lean >> <https://asq.org/quality-resources/lean>. >> >> KRVC/Quality Exploration Exploitation Evaluation >> Define >> Measure >> Analyze >> Improve >> Control >> >> Define the problem, improvement activity, opportunity for improvement, >> the project goals, and customer (internal and external) requirements. >> Project charter to define the focus, scope, direction, and motivation for >> the improvement team >> Voice of the customer to understand feedback from current and future >> customers indicating offerings that satisfy, delight, and dissatisfy them >> Value stream map to provide an overview of an entire process, starting >> and finishing at the customer, and analyzing what is required to meet >> customer needs >> Measure process performance. >> Process map for recording the activities performed as part of a process >> Capability analysis to assess the ability of a process to meet >> specifications >> Pareto chart to analyze the frequency of problems or causes >> Analyze the process to determine root causes of variation and poor >> performance (defects). >> Root cause analysis (RCA) to uncover causes >> Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for identifying possible >> product, service, and process failures >> Multi-vari chart to detect different types of variation within a process >> Improve process performance by addressing and eliminating the root causes. >> Design of experiments (DOE) to solve problems from complex processes or >> systems where there are many factors influencing the outcome and where it >> is impossible to isolate one factor or variable from the others >> Kaizen event to introduce rapid change by focusing on a narrow project >> and using the ideas and motivation of the people who do the work >> Control the improved process and future process performance. >> Quality control plan to document what is needed to keep an improved >> process at its current level >> Statistical process control (SPC) for monitoring process behavior >> *Balanced Scoring* (my edit) to create a workplace suited for visual >> control >> Mistake proofing (poka-yoke) to make errors impossible or immediately >> detectable >> cheers >> >> Carl >> It was a pleasure to clarify >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> >> Date: Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM >> Subject: Re: AIKR Value Chain >> To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org> >> Cc: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>, Chris Fox < >> chris@chriscfox.com>, Paul Alagna <pjalagna@gmail.com>, Justin Stoltzfus >> <stoltz_sj@hotmail.com>, Jorge Sanchez. <jorgesr@zoho.eu>, Owen Ambur < >> Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> >> >> >> >> Confirming that the AI KR value chain will be the focus of our next >> meeting on September 15 (invite to be sent separately). >> In addition to ITIF's model (see below), as a use-case please review The >> knowledge-value chain: A conceptual framework for knowledge translation in >> health ( Bulletin of the World Health Organisation ). In particular, >> please peruse fig1. The mission, vision, goals and strategies of a >> public health organization or social enterprise drive the knowledge-value >> chain. The higher the knowledge performance related to dyadic capabilities, >> the higher the value generated (Fig. 1). >> >> >> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6869769_The_knowledge-value_chain_A_conceptual_framework_for_knowledge_translation_in_health >> >> >> have a great weekend >> >> Carl Mattocks >> co-chair AIKRCG >> >> It was a pleasure to clarify >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:30 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: >> >>> Carl, at the end of our televideo conference earlier today you indicated >>> intent to focus on the value chain at our next meeting on September 15. So >>> I thought you might like to see this objective in ITIF's model for >>> long-term U.S./Western revitalization (in competition with China): >>> >>> ........... >>> >>>
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2020 02:11:30 UTC