Re: knowledge misrepresentation and category theory

Milton

You have started falsifying facts!!!
This could be a cognitive challenge you have

I dont know what you are talking about re Buddhism, I never mentioned
Buddhism (other than in reply to your mention once)
Can you please point to some thread? Just in case I forgot

Lately you have made some false statements systematically (including the
fact that I mentioned Buddhism, which I did not) and systematically
misrepresent what I say in your replies to my posts,

This is becoming a concern it is a considerable effort to check and correct
everything your write on this list, to make sure at a minimum, we have the
corrections on record

For example in this very thread I mentiond  a) b) and C  as  causes of
misrepresentation and C) only relates to category theory /this is very
clear in my post I think
in your reply, you sad that I attribute a, b. and c to category theory-
thats a mistake Milton-
I dont know if simply you are reading too quickly, or are deliberately
doing it -  to create confusion and make being a member of this list
less pleasant and useful than it currently is

In fact you did not reply
Where are your papers Milton, can we learn more about
your work somewhere? Please share your publications with us
and kindly make sure you read the posts and do not distort/falsify the
statements people make!

Thanks!!

PDM

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Dear Paola,
>
> You seem to be hell bent on picking fights, and you apparently want to go
> down the same road on this category theory issue as with the very heated
> Dagstuhl debate about the knowledge graphs, which got quite a few people
> upset.
>
> I am very careful about what I put online, and yes you will not find any
> publications yet.
>
> You claim to be partly inspired by Buddhist philosophy and I may hope
> Buddhist logic, and if you are well versed in the general theories of logic
> you must be aware of the implications of the Godel Skolem theorems and the
> theorems of computability about the limitations of Turing machines.
>
> We must strive for consistency instead of completeness.
>
>
> Milton Ponson
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 8:37:12 PM AST, Paola Di Maio <
> paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Milton
>
> You are getting yourself onto hot and turbulent waters by putting the
> blame and faults with category theory.
>
>
> , I am not putting any blame on anything - again your statement is a
> distortion (misinterpretation, misrepresentation) of mine.Omissions and
> Distortions are problems cause by misrepresentation
> However I think (and wrote in my post) that Miscategorization  is a
> problem with category theory. Its a known problem and has many causes and
> manifestations, I d like to think that better KR can help reduce
> miscategorization.
>
>
> The problem resides with the notion of what constitutes knowledge.
>
>
> based on my research, the problem resides in knowledge misrepresentation
> :-)
>
>
>
> I am working on a set of related papers inspired by seemingly unrelated
> applications of category theory in cognitive science studies of the brain,
> ontology alignment, the notion of perception and the philosophical debate
> about concepts, cognitive and conceptual structures,the mathematical
> underpinnings of grand unified theories and theories of everything, and
> mathematics to reconcile the Godel Skolem theorems, string theory and
> quantum reality.
>
> great. curious to read some of what your write but could not find articles
> on google scholar
> do you have a list of publications somewhere
>
>
> Again, category theory stresses consistency, and shows us systems for
> comparison of well thought and proven knowledge representation frameworks,
> not with the creation of those frameworks.
>
> yes, because our logical models are incomplete and imperfect, the
> appliication of category theory can result in fallacies.I think some
> fuzzyness can solve at least in part that
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1478
>
> Therefore IMHO the points you bring up are at the level of nuts and bolts
> construction of KR systems itself.
>
>
> Yes,  I think so.
>
> but in terms of logical consistency, the statement above does not follow
> what you said earlier
>
> ADVERB
> You use therefore to introduce
> <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/introduce> a logical
> <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/logical_1> result
> or conclusion
> <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/conclusion>.
> https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/therefore
>
> Your conclusion does not seem to follow your earlier assertions
> :-)
>
>
>
>
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>
>
> On Monday, January 13, 2020, 9:14:24 PM AST, Paola Di Maio <
> paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I ll soon be sharing a paper where I mention various errors and flaws
> caused by poor
> knowledge mis- representation,
> in brief -
> 1. omissions (where the knowledge is not represented)
> 2. distortions (where the knowledge is twisted to represent something not
> intended)
> 3. miscategorization (this problem is one of the challenges of category
> theory, not particularly well researched afaik)
>
> I wonder if KR can help address the miscategorization problem
>
>