- From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:35:47 +0800
- To: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SoZx_rk3Jdf7E5ETBGbqv2XuXU5yK2QwRwBXY4rtBJRDA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Milton You are getting yourself onto hot and turbulent waters by putting the blame > and faults with category theory. > , I am not putting any blame on anything - again your statement is a distortion (misinterpretation, misrepresentation) of mine.Omissions and Distortions are problems cause by misrepresentation However I think (and wrote in my post) that Miscategorization is a problem with category theory. Its a known problem and has many causes and manifestations, I d like to think that better KR can help reduce miscategorization. > The problem resides with the notion of what constitutes knowledge. > based on my research, the problem resides in knowledge misrepresentation :-) > > I am working on a set of related papers inspired by seemingly unrelated > applications of category theory in cognitive science studies of the brain, > ontology alignment, the notion of perception and the philosophical debate > about concepts, cognitive and conceptual structures,the mathematical > underpinnings of grand unified theories and theories of everything, and > mathematics to reconcile the Godel Skolem theorems, string theory and > quantum reality. > > great. curious to read some of what your write but could not find articles on google scholar do you have a list of publications somewhere > Again, category theory stresses consistency, and shows us systems for > comparison of well thought and proven knowledge representation frameworks, > not with the creation of those frameworks. > yes, because our logical models are incomplete and imperfect, the appliication of category theory can result in fallacies.I think some fuzzyness can solve at least in part that https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1478 Therefore IMHO the points you bring up are at the level of nuts and bolts > construction of KR systems itself. > Yes, I think so. but in terms of logical consistency, the statement above does not follow what you said earlier ADVERB You use therefore to introduce <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/introduce> a logical <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/logical_1> result or conclusion <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/conclusion> . https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/therefore Your conclusion does not seem to follow your earlier assertions :-) > > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > > > On Monday, January 13, 2020, 9:14:24 PM AST, Paola Di Maio < > paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I ll soon be sharing a paper where I mention various errors and flaws > caused by poor > knowledge mis- representation, > in brief - > 1. omissions (where the knowledge is not represented) > 2. distortions (where the knowledge is twisted to represent something not > intended) > 3. miscategorization (this problem is one of the challenges of category > theory, not particularly well researched afaik) > > I wonder if KR can help address the miscategorization problem >
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2020 00:36:26 UTC