Re: deontic logic

Their "plan" is now in the StratML collection at 
http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#SDLNS

To me, the values the org represents 
<http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SDLNSwStyle.xml#values_> read like a 
requirements statement for a standard like StratML Part 2, Performance 
Plans & Reports.

I took the liberty of inferring a vision statement 
<http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SDLNSwStyle.xml#_0bb82516-349a-11ea-9ef0-65681783ea00> 
for them.

Unlike U.S. federal agencies, they may be under no formal obligation but 
it would nonetheless be good (deontically logical) if their conference 
program were published in an open, standard (logical, normative), 
machine-readable format like StratML Part 2, as per use case Goal 20: 
Conferences & Meetings 
<http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/UC4SwStyle.xml#_8833b870-14c4-11e6-ac93-bf1cf9713b8c>. 


Owen

On 1/11/2020 12:19 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
> This society is doing work relating to this discussion
>
> not sure if/how we can cojoin/associate with them
> http://deonticlogic.org/
>