- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:59:27 +0800
- To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2020 07:00:07 UTC
following various exchanges, I wonder if are these two 'languages' formally aligned? if one of our missions is to promote natural language as a formal KR, (over, say, other formal notations) then I say our best bet is CL, because it is demonstrated as logically valid, needs no further proof If stratml can be mapped to CL, then also stratmL or any other ML that can be used equivently to CL, and to formal notation Is this the underlying argument I see lurking into the threads referencing CL and natural language? P
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2020 07:00:07 UTC