curated list review - CL extension of RULEML

All AIKR :
Regarding CL - as a candidate for our curated list of
normative/non-normative reference material - please review the paper that
speaks to a CL extension of RULEML

http://ruleml.org/papers/AthanDissertation/AthanGISDissertation2011.pdf
XCLX: An XML-based Common Logic eXtension with Embedded Geography Markup
Language

I will send a follow on 'vote please' email after January 31

thanks for your participation

Carl Mattocks
CarlMattocks@WellnessIntelligence.Institute

It was a pleasure to clarify


On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:39 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Can I suggest we stick to StratML and CL which is the basis for conceptual
> structures (see http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/cg4cs.pdf)?
>
> This way we know we are applying standards in the to be developed general
> common frame of reference for AI and KR.
>
> Will get back on this and my mission statemennt.
>
> Milton Ponson
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 7, 2020, 12:49:24 AM AST, Paola Di Maio <
> paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Owen
>
> The whole purpose of life is about making aspirations true, compatibly
> with everything else
>
> I think a small demo of an automated agents that monitors  certain key
> parameters written in xml     is perfectly feasible, given a set of rules,
> , as a proof of concept
> I generally only do only what is within my immediate reach
> Here is a way it could be done:
> have a parameter set of CG overall goals,
> for each member have a set of actions contributing to CG goals
> run the agent periodically to check the status of the actions against the
> goals
> I am fairly sure we can find a 10 years old to help us write it :-)
>
> Large scale real world implementations may not be feasible
> because too many people need to be consulted, and too many people
> have conflicting views, and there is too much speculation and profiteering
> Technologies that dont cost much (other than server and developer time
> perhaps)
> tend not to be popular
>
> So lets think of implementing a working prototype and surely it will take
> shape at some point.
> At a minimum, as they used to say, we can prove that we can eat our own
> dog food :-0D
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:14 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Please, Paola, stop.  You're about to put me over the edge.
>
> I've long been dreaming about engaging a bunch of students in a brigade to
> do for public agencies what they should be doing for themselves, i.e.,
> publishing their performance plans and reports in an open, standard,
> machine-readable format like StratML.  While I've been hoping it might
> happen in India, I can't imagine the Chinese or Russian government, for
> example, would stand for that but, hey, I love to be proven wrong ... about
> such delirious dreams.
>
> Far short of that, it would be wonderful if someone could develop a query
> service that leverages the semantics and structure of the StratML schema as
> per the requirements outlined at Query/Discovery
> <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_15446932-208f-11e6-a80e-7333871eb3cb>
> - Enable not only full-text but also faceted querying and discovery of
> discrete elements of StratML documents.
>
> There are more than 4,000 plans in the StratML collection
> <http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm> that can be used for
> demonstration purposes.  Hopefully, someday the collection will become too
> valuable to ignore or, at least, to treat as any old unstructured
> information, as the incumbent full-text indexing services apparently do.
>
> Owen
> On 1/6/2020 9:04 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
> :-)  lots of features to play with
>
> ha ha,  not sure if I would like an agent to remind me I am behind
> with my own goals but technically, neat possibility
>
> Let's work on  the idea of a possible demo implementation/prototype -
>
> I design web services (workflow, general specs etc), do not write the
> implementation code for which generally I pair with a coder
>
> can find some students who may want to do so, or coud even set out to
> spend ten minutes a week towards learning how to implement myself so that
> the geeks on this list could either help or slam
>
> P
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:46 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Don't get me too excited, Paola. I can only stand so much fun.  However,
> at the risk of becoming delirious, I invite attention to these StratML
> tool, app, and service requirements related to monitoring and nudging:
>
> Goal 7: Analysis
> <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_2384f48a-208f-11e6-8dd1-b735871eb3cb>
> - Enable automated as well as human assisted analysis
>
> Goal 11: Deadline Reminders
> <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_2384fe08-208f-11e6-8dd1-b735871eb3cb>
> - Provide notification of impending end dates for performance indicators
>
> Goal 15: Partnerships
> <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_2385057e-208f-11e6-8dd1-b735871eb3cb>
> - Enable potential performance partners to easily identify each other and
> cross-reference their common and/or complementary objectives in each
> other's respective plans and reports (transformation of the
> advertising/marketing paradigm)
>
> Goal 19: Subscriptions
> <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_23850cfe-208f-11e6-8dd1-b735871eb3cb>
> - Provide automated notification of changes/updates to goals, objectives
> and/or performance indicators of interest to particular stakeholder groups
>
> Goal 21: Critical Mass
> <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_238510c8-208f-11e6-8dd1-b735871eb3cb>
> - Enable users to rally around, create networking "bandwagon" effects,
> establish critical mass and reach tipping points at which achievement of
> goals can be assured (pledges, contributions, referrals, challenges, etc.)
>
> I'm not smart enough to write the intelligent agents but I'd love to
> connect with those who are.
>
> Owen
> On 1/6/2020 8:29 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
> Thank you Own
>
> if we write into the plan our individual proposed actions and goals
> we could probably also write some intelligent agent to monitor and nudge
> how we are doing against our own targets.  could be fun
>
> PDM
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:17 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> I updated my StratML rendition of our plan at
> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/AIKRCGforComment.xml to include the
> roles for which we have volunteered (in E-mail messages).
>
> It would be good if we could more explicitly document our proposed
> deliverables as performance indicators under each of our objectives.
>
> Anyone who may wish to contribute toward that end could use the mailto
> links in the plan to address comments to our listserv.
>
> Owen
> On 1/3/2020 3:53 PM, carl mattocks wrote:
>
>
> To help the AI KR progress in 2020 as co-chair I propose to be:
>  Co-editor of  https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/
>  Lead editor of an  AI KR Element Inventory
>  Key contributor to AIKR eGovernance documents
>
> and continue to be a general factotum
>
>
> wishing us all a happy new decade
>
> Carl Mattocks
>
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 10:45 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Milton
>
> Glad you like the idea - I am thinking of a handbook that can serve as a
> general guidance for different domains, with one version aimed at
> egovernance.
>
> I see the focus egovernance rather than egovernment, but there is a lot of
> material
> on the latter, that we could abstract from to make it relevant and
> generalized to fit the former
>
> there is still some work to be done in terms of aligning
> different knowledge domain,
>
> also, I am working on a few parallel topics - diverse branches of KR
> applications
> with several deadlines coming up in the next few months
>
> thanks for the suggestion of starting a lit review on KR for governance
>
> Some of the resources I d like to include in a lit review are not
> accessible
> (started a search some time ago) and still searching for ways to access
> them
>
> However there are some good resources openly accessible
>
> I started a tag on zotero
>
> https://www.zotero.org/groups/2351244/knowledge_representation/items/tag/governance
>
>
> please add resources and start drafting whatever inspires you
>
> I am working on specific aspects of KR for eGov, and will share when
> ready, but in the meantime, good idea to start gathering the field
>
>
> PDM
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 12:39 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
> metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Dear members of the AIKR CG. I am particularly interested in the issue of
> AI and KR for eGovernance and eGovernment.
> The UNCAC (United Nationas Convention Against Corruption) and AML/CFT
> treaties (anti money laundering/combating financing of terrorism) are very
> specific in compliance and thus governance, but everything else is still
> vague including what should constitute corporate, social, environmental,
> human rights and sustainable development governance and the Sustainable
> Development Goals do not in particular help clearly define governance.
>
>
> In fact there is no clear definition of the boundaries, overlapping issues
> and distinction between legislation/law enforcement/compliance, moral
> conduct, ethical conduct/codes, corporate governance/rules of conduct,
> governance/guidelines.
>
> Thus eGovernance is highly context sensitive, which makes the KR very
> important and the AI component determining the context/environment very
> important as well.
>
> What would be very useful is some essays on how to map from a generalized
> set of concepts and ontologies onto the currently more familiar areas of
> legislation, legal guidelines, ethical codes of conduct and the various
> forms of more or less well established corporate, social and environmental
> governance.
>
> A useful starting point would be to do a literature review on ontologies
> and indicators for governance.
>
> Again, very good idea the eBook on AI and KR for eGovernance.
>
> Milton Ponson
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>
>
> [deleted]
>
>