- From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:04:05 +0800
- To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Cc: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>, Pradeep Jain <pradeep.jain@ictect.com>, Ronald Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=Sqfm-iaCOUYTHq5QmKrv07cv7c11dok56w3E_OoxCcbkA@mail.gmail.com>
:-) lots of features to play with ha ha, not sure if I would like an agent to remind me I am behind with my own goals but technically, neat possibility Let's work on the idea of a possible demo implementation/prototype - I design web services (workflow, general specs etc), do not write the implementation code for which generally I pair with a coder can find some students who may want to do so, or coud even set out to spend ten minutes a week towards learning how to implement myself so that the geeks on this list could either help or slam P On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:46 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > Don't get me too excited, Paola. I can only stand so much fun. However, > at the risk of becoming delirious, I invite attention to these StratML > tool, app, and service requirements related to monitoring and nudging: > > Goal 7: Analysis > <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_2384f48a-208f-11e6-8dd1-b735871eb3cb> > - Enable automated as well as human assisted analysis > > Goal 11: Deadline Reminders > <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_2384fe08-208f-11e6-8dd1-b735871eb3cb> > - Provide notification of impending end dates for performance indicators > > Goal 15: Partnerships > <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_2385057e-208f-11e6-8dd1-b735871eb3cb> > - Enable potential performance partners to easily identify each other and > cross-reference their common and/or complementary objectives in each > other's respective plans and reports (transformation of the > advertising/marketing paradigm) > > Goal 19: Subscriptions > <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_23850cfe-208f-11e6-8dd1-b735871eb3cb> > - Provide automated notification of changes/updates to goals, objectives > and/or performance indicators of interest to particular stakeholder groups > > Goal 21: Critical Mass > <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_238510c8-208f-11e6-8dd1-b735871eb3cb> > - Enable users to rally around, create networking "bandwagon" effects, > establish critical mass and reach tipping points at which achievement of > goals can be assured (pledges, contributions, referrals, challenges, etc.) > > I'm not smart enough to write the intelligent agents but I'd love to > connect with those who are. > > Owen > On 1/6/2020 8:29 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: > > Thank you Own > > if we write into the plan our individual proposed actions and goals > we could probably also write some intelligent agent to monitor and nudge > how we are doing against our own targets. could be fun > > PDM > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:17 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > >> I updated my StratML rendition of our plan at >> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/AIKRCGforComment.xml to include the >> roles for which we have volunteered (in E-mail messages). >> >> It would be good if we could more explicitly document our proposed >> deliverables as performance indicators under each of our objectives. >> >> Anyone who may wish to contribute toward that end could use the mailto >> links in the plan to address comments to our listserv. >> >> Owen >> On 1/3/2020 3:53 PM, carl mattocks wrote: >> >> >> To help the AI KR progress in 2020 as co-chair I propose to be: >> Co-editor of https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/ >> Lead editor of an AI KR Element Inventory >> Key contributor to AIKR eGovernance documents >> >> and continue to be a general factotum >> >> >> wishing us all a happy new decade >> >> Carl Mattocks >> >> It was a pleasure to clarify >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 10:45 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Milton >>> >>> Glad you like the idea - I am thinking of a handbook that can serve as a >>> general guidance for different domains, with one version aimed at >>> egovernance. >>> >>> I see the focus egovernance rather than egovernment, but there is a lot >>> of material >>> on the latter, that we could abstract from to make it relevant and >>> generalized to fit the former >>> >>> there is still some work to be done in terms of aligning >>> different knowledge domain, >>> >>> also, I am working on a few parallel topics - diverse branches of KR >>> applications >>> with several deadlines coming up in the next few months >>> >>> thanks for the suggestion of starting a lit review on KR for governance >>> >>> Some of the resources I d like to include in a lit review are not >>> accessible >>> (started a search some time ago) and still searching for ways to access >>> them >>> >>> However there are some good resources openly accessible >>> >>> I started a tag on zotero >>> >>> https://www.zotero.org/groups/2351244/knowledge_representation/items/tag/governance >>> >>> >>> please add resources and start drafting whatever inspires you >>> >>> I am working on specific aspects of KR for eGov, and will share when >>> ready, but in the meantime, good idea to start gathering the field >>> >>> >>> PDM >>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 12:39 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program < >>> metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear members of the AIKR CG. I am particularly interested in the issue >>>> of AI and KR for eGovernance and eGovernment. >>>> The UNCAC (United Nationas Convention Against Corruption) and AML/CFT >>>> treaties (anti money laundering/combating financing of terrorism) are very >>>> specific in compliance and thus governance, but everything else is still >>>> vague including what should constitute corporate, social, environmental, >>>> human rights and sustainable development governance and the Sustainable >>>> Development Goals do not in particular help clearly define governance. >>>> >>>> >>>> In fact there is no clear definition of the boundaries, overlapping >>>> issues and distinction between legislation/law enforcement/compliance, >>>> moral conduct, ethical conduct/codes, corporate governance/rules of >>>> conduct, governance/guidelines. >>>> >>>> Thus eGovernance is highly context sensitive, which makes the KR very >>>> important and the AI component determining the context/environment very >>>> important as well. >>>> >>>> What would be very useful is some essays on how to map from a >>>> generalized set of concepts and ontologies onto the currently more familiar >>>> areas of legislation, legal guidelines, ethical codes of conduct and the >>>> various forms of more or less well established corporate, social and >>>> environmental governance. >>>> >>>> A useful starting point would be to do a literature review on >>>> ontologies and indicators for governance. >>>> >>>> Again, very good idea the eBook on AI and KR for eGovernance. >>>> >>>> Milton Ponson >>>> GSM: +297 747 8280 >>>> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad >>>> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean >>>> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development >>>> to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied >>>> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development >>>> >>>> >>>> [deleted] >>>> >>>>
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2020 02:04:46 UTC