Template for Social Impact Statements for Algorithms

The template is now available at 
https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TSISA with a link that opens it 
for editing in an XForm.

Owen

On 4/21/2020 7:58 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
> Great stuff Owen
> thanks a lot
> I am working on integrating FAT  into knowledge representation
> The website has a great list of resources to work with,
> lets work on this too,
> P
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:54 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net 
> <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote:
>
>     FATML.org's about statement is now available in StratML format at
>     https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#FATML
>
>     So too are their Principles for Accountable Algorithms and a
>     Social Impact Statement for Algorithms.  Like corporate social
>     responsibility plans and reports, social impact statements for
>     algorithms should be published on the Web in an open, standard,
>     machine-readable format like StratML Part 2.
>
>     Anyone who is socially responsible enough to do that for their
>     algorithm could get started as easily as by clicking on this link
>     <http://stratml.us/forms/walt5.pl?url=http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SIS4A.xml>
>     and editing the document to include the relevant performance
>     indicators and stakeholder roles.
>
>     Might a more generic version of the plan be a good deliverable for
>     the AIKR CG?
>
>     See these StratML use cases:
>
>         Goal 4: Corporations
>         <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/UC4SwStyle.xml#_1f82f648-083e-11e6-a8aa-42bd45c7ae33>
>         - Publish corporate social responsibility (CSR) plans and
>         reports on the Web in open, standard, machine-readable format.
>
>         Goal 30: Artificial Intelligence
>         <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/UC4SwStyle.xml#_6f069874-bb92-11e7-9b76-f79f9342c8d9>
>         - Document on the Web in StratML format the performance plans
>         of proposed artificial intelligence agents.
>
>         Goal 33: Artificial Ignorance
>         <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/UC4SwStyle.xml#_7f412cd0-81a7-11ea-8156-25622d83ea00>
>         - Help human beings overcome their personal biases that
>         prevent them from attending to evidence that is applicable to
>         the realization of their objectives.
>
>     Owen
>
>     On 4/20/2020 10:26 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>     Hello Frank
>>     Thanks for reply and for your interest
>>     (At the back of my mind I wonder if you are related to Nicola)
>>
>>     I am working on FAT AI - yes, there is strong AI. weak AI and FAT
>>     AI - ha ha
>>     In particular, I developing a knowledge object for FAT KR, fair,
>>     accountable transparent
>>
>>     https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1ARnEiubC7bDkSsJzAKvapYISYGANz5D9oOTEvuxR-lE/edit?usp=sharing
>>     Please note this is an infographic, not a UML nor flowchart
>>
>>     I am preparing a lecture and writing up note do nto ahve a
>>     narrative yet but in sum, we need a way of instilling the notion
>>     of adequacy
>>     into KR. At the moment it is a bit notionally done. And FAT is
>>     one set of such possible evaluation criteria for adequacy
>>
>>     (Also others of course)
>>     I am interested in feedback  on the diagram , can you make sense
>>     of it?
>>     can it be clarified/improved?
>>
>>
>>              I’ve personally spent years working with data-driven
>>             schema-less models that help eliminate such biases and
>>             open up a world of model representations that allow
>>             knowledge to form freely and adjust dynamically to data
>>             changes.
>>
>>     Please do share your stuff , i d like to include/reference it in
>>     this work
>>     cheeers
>>
>>     PDM
>>
>>     On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:08 AM Frank Guerino
>>     <frank.guerino@if4it.com <mailto:frank.guerino@if4it.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Paola,
>>
>>         This is very interesting. Thank you for sharing it.
>>
>>         In addition to researching bias as a pathology resulting from
>>         poor knowledge modeling, you may want to also consider the
>>         reverse (i.e. poor modelling/models that result from
>>         biases).  One such bias arises from the notion that model
>>         structures must be pre-designed and imprinted in database
>>         schemas in order to capture model data, forcing data to be
>>         restructured/transformed to fit the model’s design rather
>>         than having the model result from the ever changing data,
>>         itself.  We see this with enterprise modeling tools (e.g.
>>         Architecture Modeling Tools, Cause & Effect Models, CMDBs,
>>         etc.).  I’ve personally spent years working with data-driven
>>         schema-less models that help eliminate such biases and open
>>         up a world of model representations that allow knowledge to
>>         form freely and adjust dynamically to data changes.
>>
>>         Another example is “standards” (which are like belly buttons
>>         because everyone has one).  Often, standards establish
>>         pre-conceived notions and cause severe narrowmindedness,
>>         yielding the opposite of their original intent.
>>
>>         There are many such biases that cause bad modelling/models
>>         and you may want to explore them as well.
>>
>>         My Best,
>>
>>
>>         Frank
>>
>>         --
>>
>>         /Frank Guerino, Principal Managing Partner/
>>
>>         */The International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT)
>>         /*/http://www.if4it.com
>>         1.908.294.5191 (M)/
>>
>>         /Guerino1_Skype (S)/
>>
>>         *From: *Ontolog Forum <ontolog-forum@googlegroups.com
>>         <mailto:ontolog-forum@googlegroups.com>> on behalf of Paola
>>         Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com <mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com>>
>>         *Reply-To: *Ontolog Forum <ontolog-forum@googlegroups.com
>>         <mailto:ontolog-forum@googlegroups.com>>
>>         *Date: *Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 4:18 AM
>>         *To: *Ontolog Forum <ontolog-forum@googlegroups.com
>>         <mailto:ontolog-forum@googlegroups.com>>, W3C AIKR CG
>>         <public-aikr@w3.org <mailto:public-aikr@w3.org>>
>>         *Subject: *[ontolog-forum] Catalog of Biases
>>
>>         This is a very good find for me
>>
>>         https://catalogofbias.org/biases/
>>
>>          and hopefully also for fellows on the lists
>>
>>         I am researching bias as a pathology resulting from poor
>>         knowledge modelling, the remedy is
>>
>>         knowledge representation
>>
>>         It happens to be structured as a taxonomy, what fun
>>
>>         PDM
>>
>>         -- 
>>         All contributions to this forum are covered by an open-source
>>         license.
>>         For information about the wiki, the license, and how to
>>         subscribe or
>>         unsubscribe to the forum, see http://ontologforum.org/info/
>>         ---
>>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>         Google Groups "ontolog-forum" group.
>>         To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>         it, send an email to
>>         ontolog-forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>>         <mailto:ontolog-forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
>>         To view this discussion on the web visit
>>         https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAMXe%3DSo%2B%3D1X3A4VGN6Ecv78MD604vWRU7600oimG3jDr0fsLtw%40mail.gmail.com
>>         <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAMXe%3DSo%2B%3D1X3A4VGN6Ecv78MD604vWRU7600oimG3jDr0fsLtw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>
>>         -- 
>>         All contributions to this forum are covered by an open-source
>>         license.
>>         For information about the wiki, the license, and how to
>>         subscribe or
>>         unsubscribe to the forum, see http://ontologforum.org/info/
>>         ---
>>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>         Google Groups "ontolog-forum" group.
>>         To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>         it, send an email to
>>         ontolog-forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>>         <mailto:ontolog-forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
>>         To view this discussion on the web visit
>>         https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CD63D594-3C23-42D1-BFDD-6D3A383FC126%40if4it.com
>>         <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CD63D594-3C23-42D1-BFDD-6D3A383FC126%40if4it.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>

Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2020 19:21:09 UTC