- From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 10:10:58 +0800
- To: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SoFN-xgs+bZFnojbZ-2o_AtDVqgzQASDZ38gZ5au591ug@mail.gmail.com>
Carl, thanks for your invitation to possibly co-author a paper. Same as for Torbjorn and Dave R, I would encourage to start a draft paper outline with a few guiding questions perhaps and link it to the group's wiki, so that when the right opportunity arises we can put our hands on this topic I very much welcome your input and slide but keeping in mind that the blockchain is a bit obscure and even hostile to me (as well as much of where the world is going in geneal), I must admit that some of the stuff you send reads like a series of slogans to me . I d like to see more articulate arguments for those concepts/words you are listing to be able to evaluate them. As things stand, I cant make enough sense from it to be able to engage with the topic But I do welcome your guidance on the subject so please roll things out for us! best PDM On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:34 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote: > Paola > > Additional reference- > > > - Data Scientist Evaluation phase includes production of quality > measurements and statistically significant metrics. > https://www-01.ibm.com/events/wwe/grp/grp304.nsf/vLookupPDFs/Polong%20Lin%20Presentation/$file/Polong%20Lin%20Presentation.pdf > - Types of metrics can be: > > > 1. > 1. > https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ > > 2. 2. Evaluation Metrics > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#chapter-02> > 1. Classification Metrics > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp2648768> > 1. Accuracy > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp6624> > 2. Confusion Matrix > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp2715392> > 3. Per-Class Accuracy > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp2641088> > 4. Log-Loss > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp917632> > 5. AUC > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp2152048> > 2. Ranking Metrics > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#ranking-metrics> > 1. Precision-Recall > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp2734752> > 2. Precision-Recall Curve and the F1 Score > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp399056> > 3. NDCG > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp403824> > 3. Regression Metrics > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp405040> > 1. RMSE > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp2796256> > 2. Quantiles of Errors > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp2658688> > 3. “Almost Correct” Predictions > <https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch02.html#idp541040> > > > Let me now if you think it would be interesting to co-author a paper that > expands on the presentation content > > enjoy > Carl Mattocks > > It was a pleasure to clarify > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 8:35 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Paola: >> >> Wellness indicator is a type of Key Performance Indicator, which >> provides quantifiable information about the health of your (AI) service, >> helps identify opportunities for service improvement and provide a measure >> of the progress toward achieving your eGovernance objective. >> If you can’t measure it, you can’t eGovern it! >> cheers >> >> Carl Mattocks >> 908 391 1670 >> >> >> It was a pleasure to clarify >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 9:01 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you Carl >>> I have not yet bought into blockchain, personally, but I have no >>> objections to >>> put that forward as your own vision/direction >>> The wellness indicator is interesting but how is it defined? Could you >>> show >>> an example of wellness indicator applicable, or equivalent, or some info >>> on how to go about it >>> etc >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:13 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Paola >>>> >>>> Wellness Check is one (of many) task that could be performed to fulfill >>>> an AIKR eGovernance objective ...... Evidence that a Wellness Check >>>> has been performed includes ..... >>>> There is [1] a Wellness Indicator, a simple fit for purpose score, is >>>> used to understand effectiveness of a AIKR powered Business Service >>>> capability . [2] Purpose has been explained by members of particular >>>> Community of Interest (composed of a Richly Diverse group of discipline >>>> specific Data Scientists e.g. Sociologist, psychologist, dermatologist, >>>> …). [3] Explanation is supported by Data Science evidence that the >>>> capability has been proven in Digital Clinical Trials. >>>> >>>> Ref: >>>> https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/events/2019/digital-clinical-trials-workshop-creating-vision-future >>>> >>>> >>>> Regarding [2] Mandatorily, the COI explanation, of AIKR powered >>>> service capability, identifies how the COI Formulation was Proven when the >>>> service was actuated using one or more Registered Agents. Proof includes >>>> DataSet statistics that report extent of the actual change in state >>>> (unfreezing, changing and refreezing) for the population of information >>>> facets made accessible by a Container populated by Blockchain & >>>> Registry-Repository Objects IDs >>>> >>>> cheers >>>> >>>> Carl Mattocks >>>> +1 908 391 1670 >>>> It was a pleasure to clarify >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 11:29 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Carl - >>>>> pondering further on your input below, and before I paste your slide >>>>> into the presentation >>>>> Some terms need to be defined before they can be used >>>>> For example the "wellness check'' can be many things, can you qualify >>>>> what do you mean by that (I would not want to invoke a process that can >>>>> easily be distorted). Many wellness checks are carried out according to >>>>> 'sick'principles, or by 'sick'organisations, surely you cannot mean that? >>>>> also KR Calibration and other words you use. Otherwise I ll edit out the >>>>> obscure terms >>>>> PDM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:46 AM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Carl, clearer now, thanks, but still very compressed >>>>>> Is this a model, a process, a system or something else? >>>>>> A few more questions in CAPS, and a URL for these slides? >>>>>> >>>>>> Title: DRAFT OF A PROPOSED KR OBJECTIVE >>>>>> *aka a possible example of How KR can improve AI in E Governance >>>>>> >>>>>> Wellness Indicator, a simple fit for purpose score, is used >>>>>> HOW?? to understand effectiveness of a AIKR >>>>>> powered Business Service capability . >>>>>> WHAT DOES THE WELLNESS INDICATOR LOOK LIKE? >>>>>> Purpose has been explained by members of particular >>>>>> Community of Interest (composed of a Richly Diverse group of >>>>>> discipline specific Data Scientists >>>>>> e.g. Sociologist, psychologist, dermatologist, ...). Explanation is >>>>>> supported by Data Science evidence >>>>>> that the capability has been proven in Digital Clinical Trials. >>>>>> Ref: >>>>>> https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/events/2019/digital-clinical-trials-workshop-creating-vision-future >>>>>> >>>>>> OK - THANKS FOR THE LINKS >>>>>> COULD YOU SUMMARISE PLS WHAT KR RELATED CAPABILITY HAS BEEN PROVEN BY >>>>>> THE TRIALS IN ONE LINE >>>>>> >>>>>> Mandatorily, the COI explanation, of AIKR powered service capability, >>>>>> identifies how the COI >>>>>> Formulation was Proven when the service was actuated using one or >>>>>> more Registered Agents. >>>>>> WHAT ARE REGISTERED AGENTS >>>>>> >>>>>> Proof includes DataSet statistics that report extent of the actual >>>>>> change in state (unfreezing, >>>>>> changing and refreezing) for the population of information facets >>>>>> made accessible by a Container >>>>>> populated by Blockchain & Registry-Repository Objects IDs >>>>>> >>>>>> eGovernance: What We Need To Understand >>>>>> >>>>>> • Business Service Determination - EXPLAIN? >>>>>> • Community of Interest (Rich Diversity of Ologists) >>>>>> • Capability Contract (Agreed in Digital Clinical Trials) >>>>>> • Container Control Measurement >>>>>> • Creator Identity Management (Threat Matrix Protection) >>>>>> • Function Schema Decision Point (Constraint Algorithm) >>>>>> • Knowledge Content Management >>>>>> • Content Generation Blockchain (Imported, Applied, Improved) >>>>>> • Information Registry-Repository (Multipoint Object Classification) >>>>>> >>>>>> What AI (With KR) Can Do Better >>>>>> >>>>>> • Business Service Definition >>>>>> • Context Specific Knowledge (Curated by Virtual Community) >>>>>> • Condition Specific Policy (Pattern Proven in Trials) >>>>>> • Container Control Actuation >>>>>> • Registration Authentication (Pseudo-Anonymous Processing) >>>>>> • Transaction Authorization Decision (Algorithm Gateway Path) >>>>>> • Knowledge Content Audit >>>>>> • Intelligence Evolution (Object Rule, Property Change, Entity State) >>>>>> • Information Node Location (KR Calibration) >>>>>> WHAT IS KR CALIBRATION?? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 11:07 AM Paola Di Maio < >>>>>> paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah... community of interest.... >>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>> P >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:38 AM carl mattocks < >>>>>>> carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Owen, Paola et al: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, for planning purposes, it is the draft of a proposed AIKR >>>>>>>> eGovernance objective.. that leverages emerging data science best practice >>>>>>>> and AIKR-centric proofs established by digital clinical trials >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> AIKR eGovernance objective >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wellness Indicator, a simple fit for purpose score, is used to >>>>>>>> understand effectiveness of a AIKR powered Business Service capability . >>>>>>>> Purpose has been explained by members of particular Community of Interest >>>>>>>> (composed of a Richly Diverse group of discipline specific Data Scientists >>>>>>>> e.g. Sociologist, psychologist, dermatologist, …). Explanation is supported >>>>>>>> by Data Science evidence that the capability has been proven in Digital >>>>>>>> Clinical Trials. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ref: >>>>>>>> https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/events/2019/digital-clinical-trials-workshop-creating-vision-future >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mandatorily, the COI explanation, of AIKR powered service >>>>>>>> capability, identifies how the COI Formulation was Proven when the service >>>>>>>> was actuated using one or more Registered Agents. Proof includes DataSet >>>>>>>> statistics that report extent of the actual change in state (unfreezing, >>>>>>>> changing and refreezing) for the population of information facets made >>>>>>>> accessible by a Container populated by Blockchain & Registry-Repository >>>>>>>> Objects IDs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>> Carl Mattocks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It was a pleasure to clarify >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 10:37 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Carl, I can almost discern the makings of a plan in the content of >>>>>>>>> your slides but it would be easier to comprehend if it were in the form of >>>>>>>>> an actual plan. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The stratml:Relationship elements could be used to align it with >>>>>>>>> the goals set forth in the AIKRCG's plan -- >>>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AIKRCGwStyle.xml -- using the XForm >>>>>>>>> at http://stratml.us/forms/Part2Form.xml >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If there is any interest in doing so, I'll be happy to provide any >>>>>>>>> assistance that may be required. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Owen >>>>>>>>> On 8/24/2019 5:38 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you Carl and all >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i appreciate your input, although it still sounds a bit encrypted. >>>>>>>>> care to unpack it a bit more:? re the slides something >>>>>>>>> telegraphic *but hopefully clearn nonetheless, will work, for the paper, I >>>>>>>>> may need to articulate some sentence in narrative form >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> is this a suggestion> a proposal> something that you are dong or >>>>>>>>> that you want to do? >>>>>>>>> a couple more questions below >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Embedded this in updated AI can do Better with KR .. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Wellness (fit for purpose score) Indicator >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OF WHAT? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> derived from Explain effective change in state (unfreezing, >>>>>>>>>> changing and refreezing) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WHAT CHANGE? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> actuated by Registered Agent (using COI Formulated & Proven AIKR >>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> UHM COI, COI. COI - certificae of insurance? issued by who? for >>>>>>>>> what purpose >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> employing Container Content (Blockchain & Registry-Repository >>>>>>>>>> Objects IDs) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> UHM, HOW DOES THAT WORK? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> enjoy >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Carl Mattocks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Wellness Intelligence . Institute >>>>>>>>>> It was a pleasure to clarify >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:56 PM Paola Di Maio < >>>>>>>>>> paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Carl Owen and Milton' >>>>>>>>>>> I ll use one slide from each of you - which I may edit a bit - >>>>>>>>>>> including a link/url to any fuller resources >>>>>>>>>>> you want to be included. >>>>>>>>>>> Carl could you please explain with one sentence the points you >>>>>>>>>>> make, especially the less obvious one? >>>>>>>>>>> I need to understand what your are saying in order to be able to >>>>>>>>>>> relay it in the talk >>>>>>>>>>> P >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:44 AM carl mattocks < >>>>>>>>>>> carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My contribution .. using my own suggestion for Title :} >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> enjoy >>>>>>>>>>>> Carl Mattocks >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It was a pleasure to clarify >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:56 PM carl mattocks < >>>>>>>>>>>> carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent Title for one or more slides >>>>>>>>>>>>> AI can do better ... if only we have the understanding >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Carl Mattocks >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a pleasure to clarify >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:35 PM Owen Ambur < >>>>>>>>>>>>> Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paola, I added a slide entitled "'Machine-Readable Knowledge >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Results" and made a few other tweaks in the attached >>>>>>>>>>>>>> update. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Having spent my entire 34-year career in government, I too >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dislike politics. I'm aiming to disintermediate politics and politicians >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from as much as possible -- in a peer-to-peer based worldwide web of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> intentions, stakeholders, and results (which is the vision of the StratML >>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not politicians who are to blame so much as We the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> People ourselves. We can do better ... if only we have the understanding >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and will to do so. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that not the purpose of "representing" knowledge? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Owen >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 11:01 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Owen >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You send so much stuff and seems all good >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I completely dislike politics, makes me dizzy even >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can easily add two links to the slides and video to my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> slides and paper as pointers to this work >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please take a few more days to elaborate with your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> associates0 we have one week or so - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> please give url for both the resources you attached and if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you could edit to explain (assuming the audience may not know) with a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> simple sentence for each point >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - what is machine readability >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - how is stratml good to deliver machine readabiity and other >>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefits vs other options >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (with link to stratml.org) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - how is machine redabiity relates to KR and explainability >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will make the contribution more relevant to the talk >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thank you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> P >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:47 AM Owen Ambur < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paola, there's nifty introduction to StratML presentation at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, it is a bit outdated, is not particularly tailored for a KR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audience, and probably includes TMI as well. So I whipped up the attached >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> four slides. Please let me know if you'd like anything more or different. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This site reads a previous version of Wikipedia's article on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> StratML for the benefit of the blind, including information subsequently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deleted by the Wikipedia police: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not much for making (or watching) videos myself but I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that many others are. So I'm copying a couple of my associates in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event they may wish to take up that cause. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not just politicians who don't want to be held >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accountable. That's human nature. So beyond the obligation of each of us >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to hold ourselves and our immediate associates accountable, we also have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the power to hold public officials accountable -- regardless of whether >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they are willing "man up" to doing so themselves or not. However, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accountability means more than merely holding opinions and criticizing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based upon our own biases and dueling narratives. It requires clearly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified performance metrics, readily available to stakeholders. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In short it requires an open, standard, machine-readable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format like StratML. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President Trump's management agenda is available in StratML >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> along with a link that opens it in an XForm for anyone who may wish to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reports his administration's performance against those objectives. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Former President Obama's change.gov agenda is available at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A bunch of candidate issue statements are available in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> StratML format at http://ambur.net/#Candidates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The question is whether voters truly want change or whether, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like politicians themselves, they are satisfied with more of the same, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-serving #GOFPAU >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and only care about gaining the upper hand to impose their will upon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others... in which case we will be demonstrating a sadly lacking sense of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enlightenment ... an inability to learn from the mistakes of the past, thus >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dooming future generations to re-living it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that's the case, shame on us. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Owen >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Owen >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most politicians do not really want to be held accountable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for what they say or do, especially when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their missions fail for unknown reasons (manouvers in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> political underworld to ensure discord) really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is the problem that xml wont fix. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People who understand machine readability, do not need to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convinced >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of anything, those who dont understanding may need a quick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lecture, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I ll make sure your contribution is included with your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compliments :-) if you want to create >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a short video or set of slides introducing stratML in a few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullet points also its relation to KR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can also include it as a link as a footnote in the slides >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and paper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Delivers value and does not cost anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PDM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen Ambur < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paola, I'm not sure how it might fit into your outline, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perspective, any discussion of "explainability in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-governance" would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incomplete without addressing the importance of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine-readable public >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> records based upon internationally standardized schemas. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E-gov plans and performance reports are particularly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important sets of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such documents. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it would also be good if the agendas for events like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published as performance plans in an open, standard, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine-readable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format like StratML Part 2 (formerly ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value-added intermediaries could facilitate stakeholder >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collaboration >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before, during, and after each event. See, for example, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any event, IACT and TEG's about statements are now in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the StratML >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collection at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Owen >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > We are giving a talk *and a paper next month on the topic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > AI KR for Explainability in EGovernance >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The outline of the talk so far is: (2-4 slides for each >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > overview and intro about AI KR and explainability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (assuming audience >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > doesn know) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > relevance to E-Governance >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > challenges and solutions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > actions (probably referring people back to this group) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > If anyone is interested in contributing a few slides and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a paragraph >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > or two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > let me know and I ll share the drafts for editing, so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > fill out a few bits >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > and of course be credited accordingly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > deadline for final submission is 1 Sept , so all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributions must >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > reach me before Aug 30 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > so that I can edit them into the draft >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Thanks, best regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Received on Friday, 20 September 2019 02:12:01 UTC