- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:01:54 +0800
- To: Owen Ambur <owen.ambur@verizon.net>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SqA5rPak7fx_RZZpVpTE726vvcABpWULVD65Yj9h8aYJg@mail.gmail.com>
Milton and all there are goals and various documents and repositories on the Groups web page. I am working on one or two of those items, in relation to my research, and will be happy to share the outcomes when I have progress. The rest is free for group members to edit, add, create etc. The only thing that we should do get others to comment on people inputs/actions/outcomes PDM On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:19 AM Owen Ambur <owen.ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > Thanks for your kind remarks, Milton. > > The sustainable development goals (SDGs) are already available in StratML > format at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#UN or, more specifically, > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/UNSDGwStyle.xml Each goal and objective has > a GUID that can be referenced in other, supportive plans, thereby > documenting virtual partnerships. > > See, for example, SDG: > > Objective 17.6: > <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/UNSDGwStyle.xml#_b061e346-5042-11e9-aeb5-d9d1901d81c0>Cooperation > & Knowledge - Enhance North-South, South-South and triangular regional > and international cooperation on and access to science, technology and > innovation and enhance knowledge sharing on mutually agreed terms, > including through improved coordination among existing mechanisms, in > particular at the United Nations level, and through a global technology > facilitation mechanism > > > See also StratML use cases: > > Goal 14: > <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/UC4SwStyle.xml#_0fc1e310-08a5-11e6-b06f-a2fa45c7ae33>Partnerships > & Multi-Organization Groups - Use the Relationship elements to > cross-reference common and complementary objectives in the plans of each > member of a partnership, consortium, or other informal group. > Goal 18: > <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/UC4SwStyle.xml#_0fc1e4d2-08a5-11e6-b06f-a2fa45c7ae33>Virtual > Organizations - Create virtual organizations as implementers of the goals > and objectives documented on the Web in StratML format by their > participants. > > > If this group had a plan, the stratml:Relationship elements > <http://stratml.us/references/oxygen/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216_xsd.htm#Relationship> > could be used to strategically align (literally link) its objective(s) to > the SDGs. This form could be used to do that: > http://stratml.us/forms/Part2Form.xml > > As far as the W3C is concerned, I am about to give up on them as well. > From my perspective, they're starting to look pretty artificially ignorant > <https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/artificial-ignorance-owen-ambur/> (of > their own XML standard, for example). I'm beginning to think the > organization may have outlived its usefulness, if not assumed the role of > defending the incumbent powers-that-be rather than stimulating openness and > innovation. > > On the other hand, of course, I am also quite aware of my own limitations > and am open to learning the weaknesses of my knowledge as well as the > errors of my logic and understanding. > > BTW, with respect to applying AI make sense of documents, I'm looking > forward to seeing what Jean Paoli and his Docugami > <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DCGMwStyle.xml> colleagues can do. > However, to the degree that humans (and organization like the UN) insist on > continuing to produce amorphous documentation, if any documentation at all, > the ability of AI agents to make sense of it is limited. For example, even > though all strategic plans contain essentially the same content, AI agents > may not be able to parse out the goals, objectives, and stakeholders if the > content is haphazardly formatted. No doubt, someday they will have such > capabilities, but in the meantime, the question arises as to why we insist > upon making it so hard for AI agents to help us accomplish our objectives. > > Owen Ambur > https://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com> > To: public-aikr <public-aikr@w3.org>; Owen Ambur <owen.ambur@verizon.net> > Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 5:54 pm > Subject: Re: Getting organized > > Dear Owen, > > I very much appreciate your contributions to this listserv, and I share > with you the viewpoint that "the representation of knowledge should > support the achievement of human objectives." In my case a.o. achieving > the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN and sustainable development of > humankind in general. > > The UN and UNESCO as the designated and principal science, technology and > education body of the UN share our viewpoint as well and even add an > ethical dimension to this. > > I will look into to the UN and UNESCO documents on AI and see how we can > translate these into strategic planning to fully benefit from StratML. > > Each of us brings his own ideas, ideals, thoughts, knowledge and > experience and obviously expectations into this Community Group, and the > diversity and the richness of ideas is what makes this collective endeavor > important. > > And this is what I sincerely hope Paola will be able to convey in Fukuoka, > and also achieve with the interest generated with the upcoming special > journal edition on AI and KR. > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > > > On Wednesday, July 10, 2019, 4:20:41 PM ADT, Owen Ambur < > owen.ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > > > As I understand Milton's point, it is the same one I've been trying to get > across: It is hard to know what to do if we don't know what we're trying > to accomplish and have no way of determining whether we're making any > progress or not. > > From my perspective, I don't believe any particular diagrams would be very > useful. I find most of them pretty frustrating. However, the "checklists" > he has suggested could be formatted as a performance plan. If there is any > interest in collaboratively authoring such a plan, I volunteer to compile > the StratML rendition ... or anyone else could do so, using the XForm at > http://legisworks.org/StratML/Part1Form.xml > > Failing that, I'm not sure maintaining a subscription to this listserv is > worth my time. I subscribed to it because the representation of knowledge > should support the achievement of human objectives. Otherwise, what's the > point? Unfortunately, however, I haven't seen much evidence that this > listserv is making any meaningful contribution to the realization of any > objectives about which I care. > > Owen Ambur > https://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> > To: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com> > Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org> > Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 12:50 pm > Subject: Re: Getting organized > > Milton > > thanks a lot for this > > I under heavy load, and working on the following > - completing and editorial and a journal article submission for the Si > (need a couple more weeks to finish ) > This will provide some input/further motivation to support the > direction of this work > - working on mapping two standards ISO and BCI mentioned earlier on > this list to a potential schema > > Your tasklist sounds good, but a bit ambitious, I think even half of > what you propose may be useful if we can get it done before september > (I am packed with deadines til the end of July) > We could also set up a date for an online brainstorm > if useful or collaborate on a shared spreadsheet > > Currently in Hong Kong for two more days, anyone on this list in HK? > Many greetings, and thanks for getting this started > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:35 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program > <metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > We have all been exchanging ideas and exploring areas of possible > interest to knowledge representation. > > > > In order for us all to make sense of what we are currently at, we need > to take stock of where we are and what we have produced so far, what we > have agreed upon and who is attending what conferences, workshops etc. from > which we could benefit. > > > > Since Paola is planning to go to Fukuoka in Japan for the annual W3C > meet, getting organized in a more structured fashion is required. > > > > Since I committed myself more or less to providing some diagram > overviews of disciplines, areas of research and subjects, and in particular > areas of application with a corresponding literature review, I would like > to know who else can pitch in to get at least the ground covered so far > documented, and possible checklists. > > > > Some suggestions for possible checklists: (1) all subjects in the > Mathematics Subject Classification that have a direct bearing on AI and KR > as related to AI, (2) standards for technical and ethical aspects of AI, > autonomous systems and e.g. robotics, (3) standards for KR,(4) professional > organizations, industry organizations, research institutes, websites, > online and printed journals and periodicals, annual conferences, workshops > etc. on AI and KR (5) public and private or academic initiatives to > implement AI and KR in the public sector, industry or society at large. > > > > Anyone up to the task? > > > > Milton Ponson > > GSM: +297 747 8280 > > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development >
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2019 04:02:58 UTC